Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs. Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Red Hat JBoss EAP
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
The Salesforce Platform is designed for building and deploying scalable cloud applications with managed hardware provisioning and app stacks. Lightning Web Components are used by developers to build reusable UI components.
$25
Per User Per Month
Pricing
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application PlatformSalesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Starter
$25.00
Per User Per Month
Plus
$100.00
Per User Per Month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Red Hat JBoss EAPSalesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application PlatformSalesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
Features
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application PlatformSalesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
Application Servers
Comparison of Application Servers features of Product A and Product B
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
6.8
9 Ratings
16% below category average
Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
-
Ratings
IDE support6.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Security management7.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Administration and management8.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Application server performance8.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Installation5.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Open-source standards compliance7.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform-as-a-Service
Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
-
Ratings
Salesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
7.2
30 Ratings
8% below category average
Ease of building user interfaces00 Ratings7.030 Ratings
Scalability00 Ratings8.028 Ratings
Platform management overhead00 Ratings8.024 Ratings
Workflow engine capability00 Ratings8.027 Ratings
Platform access control00 Ratings7.028 Ratings
Services-enabled integration00 Ratings7.028 Ratings
Development environment creation00 Ratings7.025 Ratings
Development environment replication00 Ratings6.023 Ratings
Issue monitoring and notification00 Ratings7.026 Ratings
Issue recovery00 Ratings6.025 Ratings
Upgrades and platform fixes00 Ratings8.028 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application PlatformSalesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
Small Businesses
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application PlatformSalesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
Likelihood to Recommend
8.1
(8 ratings)
8.8
(36 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
5.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.5
(3 ratings)
8.2
(9 ratings)
Performance
8.7
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.2
(2 ratings)
8.1
(15 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.5
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application PlatformSalesforce Lightning Components & Developer Experience
Likelihood to Recommend
Red Hat
JBoss EAP is subscription based/open source platform. It's very reliable and great for deploying high transaction Java based enterprise applications. It integrates well with third party components like mod_cluster and supports popular Java EE web-based frameworks such as Spring, Angular JS, jQuery Mobile, and Google Web Toolkit.
Read full review
Salesforce
If you have a large customer base and a large amount of data on each of your customers, it is really strong in creating personalized content that your salespeople can use in their pitch meetings—and then setting up workflows for automated for lifecycle journey creations to automatically go out to customers.
Read full review
Pros
Red Hat
  • MOD_CLUSTER integration. JBoss EAP integrates pretty well with mod_cluster. This is an intelligent load balancer especially useful in highly clustered environments.
  • Supports enterprise-grade features such as high availability clustering, distributed caching, messaging etc.
  • Supports deployment in on-premise, virtual and hybrid cloud environments.
Read full review
Salesforce
  • It has a very smooth integration with Salesforce and third-party tools, ensuring easy tracking of policies and assets.
  • It also has impressive security features like used-based permissions and encrypted data.
  • Everything can be managed from a centralized place which saves a lot of time.
Read full review
Cons
Red Hat
  • Difficult to replicate configuration outside of a container environment
  • Still requires quite a bit of knowledge of the CLI
  • Integration with deployment tools requires CLI knowledge
Read full review
Salesforce
  • It takes a while before it recognizes bounced emails.
  • We get so many notifications from a single action. Not sure if this can be modified in the settings though.
  • Error messages are sometimes unclear which makes it hard for us to identify the problem.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Red Hat
We are planning to migrate away from Jboss to Tomcat as Jboss has shown not interest in supporting OSGi which is heavily used at our shop
Read full review
Salesforce
No answers on this topic
Usability
Red Hat
JBoss overall is easy to use. The installation and deployment of applications are quick. Documentations and support are also readily available.
Read full review
Salesforce
It's very good, but it's still living in a little bit in an older design aspect, but I think a lot of it is about to come out, just hasn't quite gotten there yet. Still a little clunky from a you have to know it to know it or you know it to use it. It takes a little bit of training to get into it. It's not quite the, anybody can come in and start using it immediately, type feel.
Read full review
Performance
Red Hat
JBoss EAP is lightweight and doesn't really consumes much physical resources. It's high performing and suites well for high transaction Java enterprise applications. The out of box performance settings are not really great and you will have to configure the settings to suite your environment to leverage it's full benefits.
Read full review
Salesforce
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Red Hat
Fast response.
Read full review
Salesforce
I am not an administrator so there may very well be outstanding Support and I am just not privy to it. On a user level it's hard to gauge the effectiveness and responsiveness of Support because nearly everything has to go through an administrator
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Red Hat
We selected JBoss because of compatibility with EJB's. We currently are trying to reduce our footprint and will highly consider using Tomcat.
Read full review
Salesforce
We were previously using an older version prior to it becoming Salesforce Lightning Platform so we were well adverse on the advantages of using a CRM, to begin with. It made sense to convert to Salesforce Lightning Platform after we were given a free trial of the platform. Certain reps were chosen to experiment with it and from there a decision was made to move forward. We've been customers ever since.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Red Hat
  • Jboss EAP is easy to deploy and configure. This lead to lower cost and faster delivery.
  • Even though we have large number of machines running JBoss, we have only two Jboss Administrators. It doesn't requires too much administration and maintenance on daily basis and reduces number of administrators required for large implementations.
Read full review
Salesforce
  • Better visibility of Accounts and Contacts interactions makes it easier to maintain during employee transitions.
  • Tracking of current jobs and relating them to past jobs is very useful.
  • More efficient use of Sales Reps time.
  • Sales Managers have good visibility into how their people are working.
Read full review
ScreenShots