Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs. TIBCO ActiveSpaces

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Red Hat JBoss EAP
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
TIBCO ActiveSpaces
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
ActiveSpaces from TIBCO supports an application infrastructure.N/A
Pricing
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application PlatformTIBCO ActiveSpaces
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Red Hat JBoss EAPTIBCO ActiveSpaces
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application PlatformTIBCO ActiveSpaces
Features
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application PlatformTIBCO ActiveSpaces
Application Servers
Comparison of Application Servers features of Product A and Product B
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
6.8
9 Ratings
15% below category average
TIBCO ActiveSpaces
-
Ratings
IDE support6.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Security management7.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Administration and management8.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Application server performance8.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Installation5.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Open-source standards compliance7.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application PlatformTIBCO ActiveSpaces
Small Businesses
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.7 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.7 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.7 out of 10
Enterprises
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.7 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application PlatformTIBCO ActiveSpaces
Likelihood to Recommend
8.1
(8 ratings)
7.0
(3 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
5.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.5
(3 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
8.7
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.2
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.5
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application PlatformTIBCO ActiveSpaces
Likelihood to Recommend
Red Hat
JBoss EAP is subscription based/open source platform. It's very reliable and great for deploying high transaction Java based enterprise applications. It integrates well with third party components like mod_cluster and supports popular Java EE web-based frameworks such as Spring, Angular JS, jQuery Mobile, and Google Web Toolkit.
Read full review
TIBCO Software Inc.
TIBCO ActiveSpaces is useful for storing in memory data which enables fetching data quickly and efficiently. We can make use of TIBCO ActiveSpaces APIs for storing and retrieving data. In our organization, we store user session details in TIBCO ActiveSpaces and this session detail is used for authentication and authorizing user. We have integration TIBCO ActiveSpaces with React UI and TIBCO Business Works.
Read full review
Pros
Red Hat
  • MOD_CLUSTER integration. JBoss EAP integrates pretty well with mod_cluster. This is an intelligent load balancer especially useful in highly clustered environments.
  • Supports enterprise-grade features such as high availability clustering, distributed caching, messaging etc.
  • Supports deployment in on-premise, virtual and hybrid cloud environments.
Read full review
TIBCO Software Inc.
  • Like all other IMDG solutions, Tibco ActiveSpaces provides a scalable and distributed cache solution, which is supposed to have high throughput and high availability.
  • As it is under the Tibco umbrella, it is seamlessly integrated with other Tibco products.
  • It breaks the traditional "local cache" boundary and limitation, instead unifies many "local physical memory" to create one huge "In-Memory Data Grid", and serves the data provider/consumer application logically as one "Memory Cloud."
  • A lot of non-frequently updated data can be cached in this IMDG, to allow fast access, which saves the I/O latency caused by many traditional file system-backed storage solutions.
Read full review
Cons
Red Hat
  • Difficult to replicate configuration outside of a container environment
  • Still requires quite a bit of knowledge of the CLI
  • Integration with deployment tools requires CLI knowledge
Read full review
TIBCO Software Inc.
  • ActiveSpaces 3.2 is not compatible with the latest version of TIBCO Business Event 5.x. And ActiveSpaces 2.x is not compatible with ActiveSpaces 3.x hence there is a big difference in the BusinessEvents supported version of AS and the latest.
  • ActiveSpaces takes more disc space and TIBCO does not offer data compression logic out of the box. Developers need to do extra coding to use java snippets to compress and decompress the payload. Although the data compression gives must better performance and speed to the system.
  • The compression and decompression API are not offered by TIBCO out of the box, which is a shame. These are so easy and simple to implement, still TIBCOdoes not provide them as an option out of the box.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Red Hat
We are planning to migrate away from Jboss to Tomcat as Jboss has shown not interest in supporting OSGi which is heavily used at our shop
Read full review
TIBCO Software Inc.
No answers on this topic
Usability
Red Hat
JBoss overall is easy to use. The installation and deployment of applications are quick. Documentations and support are also readily available.
Read full review
TIBCO Software Inc.
TIBCO ActiveSpaces is easy to install and integrate with other product suites. It is easy to understand and implement as well. TIBCO ActiveSpaces supports multiple databases for storing the data(we are using Oracle Database). All the master data related to the users is being stored using TIBCO ActiveSpaces which keeps the data in memory and help to retrieve it quickly. It has helped to prevent concurrent login sessions by the same user as session details are stored in TIBCO ActiveSpaces and we override the existing user session with the new session details.
Read full review
Performance
Red Hat
JBoss EAP is lightweight and doesn't really consumes much physical resources. It's high performing and suites well for high transaction Java enterprise applications. The out of box performance settings are not really great and you will have to configure the settings to suite your environment to leverage it's full benefits.
Read full review
TIBCO Software Inc.
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Red Hat
Fast response.
Read full review
TIBCO Software Inc.
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Red Hat
We selected JBoss because of compatibility with EJB's. We currently are trying to reduce our footprint and will highly consider using Tomcat.
Read full review
TIBCO Software Inc.
Actually, we are gradually replacing the Tibco ActiveSpaces with Redis (for caching purpose only) or Hazelcast (for embedded mode and also for in-memory distributed computation purpose + in-memory distributed IPC purpose).
Read full review
Return on Investment
Red Hat
  • Jboss EAP is easy to deploy and configure. This lead to lower cost and faster delivery.
  • Even though we have large number of machines running JBoss, we have only two Jboss Administrators. It doesn't requires too much administration and maintenance on daily basis and reduces number of administrators required for large implementations.
Read full review
TIBCO Software Inc.
  • Developers with basic knowledge of TIBCO and general data knowledge can easily design and develop an ActiveSpaces based cached solution. As the ActiveSpaces concepts are very simple and easy to understand.
  • Some business areas can predict the high influx of a service usage during a certain period. Business will be highly rewarded if they can identify these business areas and provide a cached solution using TIBCO AS.
  • Again, this is not a TIBCO ActiveSpaces only advantage and this is true for any/all caching products.
  • Some examples for the previous points are
  • a. telecom company pre-loading (eager load) customer's usage for the last month, right before releasing/issuing the bills to the customers.
  • b. Airline industry loading the customer's itinerary a week before his travel start date. Hence the last minute scrambling to fetch the customer's itinerary travel plans can be avoided.
Read full review
ScreenShots