Reputation.com aims to help large B2C multi-location rooftops as well as B2B web-based companies monitor and improve their reputation, and optimize customer experience — online and onsite. By leveraging prescriptive analytics, the vendor's goal is to not only show customers where they stand against their competitors, but also pinpoint where the problem areas are so they can better operationalize their business.
Marketing in Marketing at Livermore Ford (Automotive, 51-200 employees)
Chose Reputation.com
Reputation.com is better in my opinion as they have been in business longer and get it right everytime for us. Reputation.com make it easy for our employees to recieve review alerts and respond in a timely manner quick and efficiently. Reputaion.com's cutsomer service is great …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose Reputation.com
Reputation.com has a better price point. Reputation has other tools that made us choose them over Binary Fountain. There is another company, although the name escapes me, that has similar services to Reputation, but they put a large focus on Yelp and Apple Maps, as opposed to …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose Reputation.com
We have considered other vendors at contract renewal but decided to stay with Reputation.com because it meets our current and projected needs and is priced competitively.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Digital Marketing Manager in Marketing at Lester Glenn Auto Group (Automotive, 501-1000 employees)
Chose Reputation.com
We used Naked Lime and Digital Airstrike prior to using Reputation and found Reputation's dashboard and overall UI to be much friendlier and easier to use across multiple staff members and management team members. Their streamline process of review platforms and online listings …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose Reputation.com
Reputation's dashboard is very easily accessible and user-friendly. They are always quick on each review where Podium was not.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I think Reputation.com is best suited for enterprise applications where you want big-picture results plus the ability to drill-down to specific locations. It is a good solution where you want to consolidate vendors as they have multiple components. Of course, certain components are more of a core competency for them than others. But in general, it's a strong solution.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Reputation.com has a better price point. Reputation has other tools that made us choose them over Binary Fountain. There is another company, although the name escapes me, that has similar services to Reputation, but they put a large focus on Yelp and Apple Maps, as opposed to Reputation who puts an emphasis on Google and Google maps.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
