Responsive vs. SendSites

In my experience, Responsive is GREAT for small teams that need a structured process to get RFPs out the door quickly. The collaboration features are key to streamlining that process. Also, the AI Assist feature is wildly helpful for a first draft, so I'm not staring at a blank screen or trying to find the right keyword combinations.

Incentivized

• Manages structure responses well
• Manages permissions from the various users that access the solution
• Allows for a global deployment with built in language capabilities
• Allows for 100% visibility into the RFx process for all stakeholders
• Allows for ease of answering via ML that has been built in

Incentivized

• Analysis Tools: although what is provided is quite good, there is definitely room for improvement. For instance it would be nice if it were easier/quicker for each evaluator to record their notes/comments when scoring, and to be able to search through those notes/comments later. Also, it would be really helpful to be able to annotate/mark-up the actual responses (highlight, underline, circle, call-out notes, etc.), with such mark-up tracked by evaluator, and with the option to hide/show mark-up.
• Results Analysis, Reporting, and Presentation: in my opinion, this is the only area of weakness in RFP360. There are very limited options, after scoring/evaluation of responses is completed, for generating reports, graphs, charts, etc. to be used in evaluating results and presenting to the end client. I've always had to export the scores and use Excel to create the necessary visuals for final analysis and presentation.
• Complex Questions: RFP360's ability to handle complex RFP questions (e.g. involving tables, charts, multi-part answers, graphics, etc.) is limited, and existing capabilities in this area are fairly cumbersome to navigate and use.

Incentivized

Although we are not running many projects through RFPIO, the Answer Library and Documents Library are extremely helpful to our internal clients and to the proposal team. Before RFPIO, we used SharePoint and it was not effective and took forever to find the information we needed. RFPIO is more sophisticated and intuitive. I like the way that users can impact the development of the tool.

Incentivized

Very easy to navigate and use. Very intuitive user interface

Incentivized

The team at RFPIO is extremely responsive. If I email our account manager or report a bug, I usually hear back within two hours. Additionally, they are quick to make software adjustments based on customer requests and needs. We had a really complicated Excel sheet that their team ended up having to upload for me because of the amount of manual work I was doing. Based on that, they updated the software within two release cycles to make the process more automated, so that future Excel uploads would be more streamlined. I have also had several suggestions implemented rather quickly, and they don't hesitate to reach out for clarification when needed.

We were able to complete an RFP during our free trial. We were already leaning toward RFPIO but that pushed us over the edge.

While others have had a good experience with Qvidian, we unfortunately did not. Our questions were never answered by our Qvidian rep, as we used it the platform had no AI capabilities, and we had very low usage. It didn't serve our needs. Responsive has been incredible in their communication, responses, partnership, and willingness to get our feedback in order to improve the platform

Incentivized

• Increased revenue - with our ability to respond to more proposals, we have seen amazing return on investment.
• Compliance oversight - the system allows our national complaince team to review answers and ensure that responses are inalignment.
• Content and brand management - RFPIO allows our marketing and design team to better manage our visual and written brand.
• Faster timeline - we have been able to take a process that used to take months into a much shorter process.

Incentivized