TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Rydoo

    Score10 out of 10
    Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
    Rydoo (formerly Xpenditure) is a cloud based travel management solution that also handles the expense management process from receipt to accounting. After taking a picture of a receipt, Rydoo will extract all relevant data, and make it ready to be exported to the accounting software of your choice.

    $10

    per month per user (starting at 5 users)

    Zip Intake-to-Procure

    Score7.9 out of 10
    Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
    Zip provides a place for employees to initiate a purchase or vendor request. Each request is routed for approval across procurement, finance, IT, data security, legal, and other teams, and Zip integrates into ERP and P2P solutions to create a PR or draft PO. The vendor states Zip works with Canva, Checkr, Hopin, Zapier, CM Group, and other companies both public and private.N/A
    Pricing
    RydooZip Intake-to-Procure
    Editions & Modules
    Essentials
    €10
    per month per user (starting at 5 users)
    Pro
    €12
    per month per user (starting at 5 users)
    Business
    Custom Pricing
    Starting at 30 active users.
    Enterprise
    Custom Pricing
    Starting at 30 active users
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    RydooZip Intake-to-Procure
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsDiscount available for annual pricing.—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    RydooZip Intake-to-Procure
    Considered Both Products
    Rydoo
    No answer on this topic
    Zip
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Would buy again
    22 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    22 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    22 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    18 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    17 Answers
    Best Alternatives
    RydooZip Intake-to-Procure
    Small Businesses
    Brex
    Score9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Expensify
    Score9 out of 10
    Precoro
    Score9.5 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Emburse Expense Enterprise (formerly Chrome River)
    Score8.3 out of 10
    GEP Quantum Intelligence
    Score9.1 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    RydooZip Intake-to-Procure
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (9 ratings)
    7.7
    (22 ratings)
    Support Rating
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    RydooZip Intake-to-Procure
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Rydoo
    I would recommend it for someone who wanted to track reimbursed expenses or credit card expenses, but there is not enough in Rydoo to work with these two distinct categories of items separately. It is not a good fit for someone looking to have their expenses seamlessly reimbursed (like Expensify). I do recommend it if you need to work with multiple currencies, because it makes that easy.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Zip
    Zip can be used for routing all vendor-level approvals for new vendors and all renewals across our organization. It can also be helpful for managing all purchases from existing vendors. For non-spend related approvals, it’s not as well suited. Zip was definitely designed for procurement workflows. They also have a vendor management portal that links up directly to something like NetSuite for management and visibility.
    Read full review
    Pros
    Rydoo
    • Saves recent accounts so you do not have to search for them each time you are adding receipts
    • Matches transactions quickly
    • Reads receipt details accurately
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Zip
    • No coding - Ability for the administrator to make changes without development resources helps us be agile as a procurement org.
    • Visibility to the user in a great user interface
    • Accountability (helps us track SLAs on response time), Audit trails keeping track of everything
    • The implementation team was incredible, as is ongoing support. They want you to succeed in your goals vs. just implement their tool
    Read full review
    Cons
    Rydoo
    • Support responsiveness.
    • Features to detail what has actually been reimbursed vs. what has been reported.
    • More flexibility in setting approval flows.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Zip
    • There are some duplicated fields such as anticipated total spend vs. price line item breakdown that asks for the same thing. This is a little bit tedious
    • Does not show which invoices got processed and applied to open POs
    • Does not integrate / migrate special custom fields within Zip Intake-to-Procure into other tech stacks (NetSuite)
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Rydoo
    When Rydoo is responsive, support is just fine, but there have been times when our requests for support have gone unanswered for more than a day when their queue has indicated response times much shorter than that.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Zip
    Incredibly responsive and helpful.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Rydoo
    Expensify was easy to use too but I feel like Rydoo does a better job of capturing receipt info with less work on the users end. Also with Rydoo you don't have to create a report, you can just submit expenses as you go. With Expensify you had to create a report first which added extra unnecessary work with no benefits.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Zip
    I prefer Zip for its for its user-friendly interface and ease of adoption, especially if the organization values a simpler and more intuitive system for users across various departments. Comparatively, Zip is a more budget-friendly solution compared to some enterprise-level systems like SAP ARIBA or Oracle PeopleSoft, especially for smaller or mid-sized organizations with specific procurement needs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Rydoo
    • Rydoo saves time, which saves money. I'm able to make and check expenses quickly.
    • Rydoo was easy to learn and integrate. It didn't require lengthly training so it smoothed the onboarding process for new hires.
    • Rydoo centralizes internal communication about specific expenses, since you can leave comments.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Zip
    • Visibility for all necessary approvers and reviewers of the process.
    • Lack of open API to other systems (i.e Mondays, Smartsheet) is causing concerns for team that might want to move away from current tool.
    • No 3rd party implementation required is huge cost / time savings.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Rydoo Screenshots

    Screenshot of iPhone app screenshotScreenshot of Online dashboard screenshotScreenshot of Expense detail screenshot

    Zip Intake-to-Procure Screenshots

    Product screenshotScreenshot of Zip supports ultra-configurable, parallel workflows with our no-code configuration.Screenshot of Zip also integrates with all major ticketing, CLM, GRC, and ERP/P2P solutions. Here's an example integration card for JIRA.Screenshot of Zip has an optional vendor-facing portal for the vendor to provide diligence materials, including documents, surveys, and even bank settlement information.Screenshot of Zip's vendor-facing portal includes an optional bank settlement form with an attestation.