Ryver vs. Stormboard

It works well for teams to discuss projects and have conversations categorized within clients. It allows us to share most file types. It has a video call feature, but it is not as sophisticated as Zoom or other products.

Incentivized

Ready to use template makes Stormboard very easy to use and gives a seamless experience to the user. It is very useful when brainstorming ideas, and solutions for a particular use case. It sometimes gives solutions to the problems we might not have thought about yet. The on-the-go whiteboard gives us a blank slate for new ideas and more collaborations.

Incentivized

• Sorts conversations
• Available as a desktop and mobile app
• Visually unconfusing

Incentivized

• Manage Key Assets for Each Meeting
• Visually present the stakeholders and requirements
• Embed multimedia in all sections
• Present a clear layout of the meeting
• Inform everyone involved of their responsibilities
• Great interfase and easy to export
• Quickly make changes to the structure of the meeting
• The mobile app is easy to use

Incentivized

• The mobile app does not work as well as the desktop
• Notifications of posts within topics are not as obvious as those at the forum level
• We should be able to define what different file types are opened in

Incentivized

• Sometimes difficult to find items on the board if they're not in the centre
• Zooming in and out can often mean things get overlooked
• Occasionally uploaded documents vanish

Incentivized

We found Slack a bit unintuitive.

Incentivized

I use Stormboard for coordination because it seems easier to use than the rest. In terms of courses, we choose the software depending on our course objectives and how tech-savvy we believe the prof and audience are. Miro is more complete, I believe, it has a ton of features and templates.

Incentivized

• It makes communicating across locations much easier
• It makes looking back on previous conversations much easier

Incentivized

• + affordable collaboration tool
• - not intuitive enough --> other tools were preferred
• - not flexible enough (section feature was a bummer)

Incentivized