SAP's Sybase Replication Server is database development and management software.
N/A
Toad Database Developer Tools
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Toad by Quest is a database management toolset that database developers, administrators and data analysts use to simplify workflows, create code free from defects, automate frequent or repetitive processes, and minimize risks. Editions include Toad for Oracle, which automates administration tasks and helps proactively manage databases while embracing performance optimization and risk mitigation. Similar editions exist for IBM DB2, SQL Server, SAP, or MySQL and Postgres environments (Toad Edge).
$229
per year
Pricing
SAP Replication Server
Toad Database Developer Tools
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Toad Edge For MySQL
$229
per year
Toad Edge For Postgres
$229
per year
Toad for SQL - Pro Edition
$437
per year
Toad for Oracle - Base Edition
$550
per year
Toad for DB2 z/OS - Base Edition
$636
per year
Toad for SAP - Base Edition
$636
per year
Toad for SQL - Xpert Edition
$763
per year
Toad for Oracle - Professional Edition
$829
per year
Toad for SQL - Dev Edition
$930
per year
Toad for DB2 z/OS - Pro Edition
$996
per year
Toad for Oracle - Professional DB Admin Edition
$1,370
per year
Toad for DB2 z/OS - Xpert Edition
$1,529
per year
Toad for SAP - Xpert Edition
$1530
per year
Toad for Oracle - Xpert Plus Edition
$1,753
per year
Toad for DB2 z/OS - Dev Edition
$1,861
per year
Toad for SAP - Dev Edition
$1863
per year
Toad for SAP - Xpert+ Edition
$2099
per year
Toad for SAP - DBA Edition
$3661
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
SAP Replication Server
Toad Database Developer Tools
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
SAP Replication Server
Toad Database Developer Tools
Features
SAP Replication Server
Toad Database Developer Tools
Data Source Connection
Comparison of Data Source Connection features of Product A and Product B
SAP Replication Server
10.0
3 Ratings
20% above category average
Toad Database Developer Tools
-
Ratings
Connect to traditional data sources
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Connecto to Big Data and NoSQL
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data Transformations
Comparison of Data Transformations features of Product A and Product B
SAP Replication Server
10.0
3 Ratings
22% above category average
Toad Database Developer Tools
-
Ratings
Simple transformations
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Complex transformations
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data Modeling
Comparison of Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
SAP Replication Server
7.6
3 Ratings
3% below category average
Toad Database Developer Tools
-
Ratings
Data model creation
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Metadata management
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Business rules and workflow
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Collaboration
7.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Testing and debugging
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data Governance
Comparison of Data Governance features of Product A and Product B
SAP Replication Server
8.0
3 Ratings
1% above category average
Toad Database Developer Tools
-
Ratings
Integration with data quality tools
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration with MDM tools
6.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Database Development
Comparison of Database Development features of Product A and Product B
SAP Replication Server
-
Ratings
Toad Database Developer Tools
8.5
32 Ratings
1% above category average
Version control tools
00 Ratings
8.918 Ratings
Test data generation
00 Ratings
6.025 Ratings
Performance optimization tools
00 Ratings
9.030 Ratings
Schema maintenance
00 Ratings
9.029 Ratings
Database change management
00 Ratings
9.528 Ratings
Database Administration
Comparison of Database Administration features of Product A and Product B
I asked questions about a warm standby and multicast replication. We ended up using bi-directional replication and a warm standby db. Having 3 or more live OLTP DB's where each was read-write was going to be difficult to manage for contention if the same table was being updated. We stuck with an easier solution to have only two OLTP's, and then used additional DB's as read-only DW's.
Toad for Oracle is very well suited for all Oracle implementations, be it single instance or RAC. It is best suited for use of Oracle DBA, Developer and Database Engineers. I don't recommend Toad for Oracle for Project Managers or Solution Architects. This can be a pricier choice for these people. They can do fine with free options like SQL Developer.
Toad is a de-facto standard tool for data developers and analysts. Generally speaking it provides almost every function needed to manage data in EDW with great performance and stability.
The nature of clinical data is big-sized: one table may have billions of rows. Toad provides critical functions to manage SQLs, e.g. Top SQL that can monitor and manage SQLs using CPU power and network bandwidth, so that EDW administrator can optimize ETL operations in the best efficiency.
Many of our data analysts are not computer science backgrounded (having clinical / nursing background). Toad provides great auditing tools such as Tuning Lab or SQL Scanner, so that data analysts can train themselves with guidance of the tool.
The power and control it gives is at the same time kind of a negative thing. There's too many options available, even when you don't need them. For simple database operations it's sometimes easier to just use SQL Developer since navigation is way more intuitive and easy.
Related with the above: there is a steep learning curve. However, since this is the main tool for any Oracle developer, this is not that much of a problem.
If I remember well, Toad used to be free, some 20 years ago. Or at least had a free version. It would be nice to have a free version. The dedicated Oracle developers and DBA's won't use the free version, but all the rest of us developers might use it instead of SQL Developer. It would make communications between everybody somewhat easier.
I give is an 8 because nothing is a 10 and there is always room for improvement. I believe the user who is not as technologically inclined would be better suited with an easier way to identify the options for setting the layout up for Toad's GUI. To some it is very cumbersome and confusing.
SAP support has been outstanding. They have quick response times and always meet their SLAs. Any time we have an issue that needs to be researched they are able to get back to us quickly with resolution.
I give the overall support for Toad for Oracle a 10/10. This is because whenever there has been an issue with this software, our team has got an immediate response. The same can not be said for similar software. The most recent example of this is when we needed to renew our licenses. Some employees were unable to log in to code with the given license key. Support was able to resolve the issue quickly.
Toad is much better than Tableau query writer. Tableau is not intuitive and requires knowledge of proprietary database language to fully implement. Tableau does not perform as quickly and accurately as Toad. Toad is very easy and slim to install. Additional hardware is often required to run Tableau smoothly. Support for Tableau is even more expensive than Toad support.
Quick and easy query development helps reduce man-hours in a project which converts to real dollars.
Query analysis and tuning result in low database overhead and low latency, thus translating into real dollars because a system can thus handle more requests from customers.
Ease of use makes it easy to deploy greenhorns in projects with minimal training, thus helping save money. Otherwise menial and simple jobs would have required experienced DBAs.