TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    BitBar

    Score6.3 out of 10
    N/ABitBar allows users to test applications across the latest and most popular real browsers and devices. Users can scale testing by increasing test coverage and decreasing test execution time by running automated tests in parallel across browsers and devices. BitBar integrates with the user's current tech stack or CI/CD pipeline. Key Features: * BitBar offers one cloud for all testing platforms whether it be web, native, or hybrid applications. * Test an application across real…

    $39

    per month

    Progress Telerik Fiddler

    Score10 out of 10
    N/AFiddler is a suite of products from Progress Telerik, designed to help users with web debugging and troubleshooting.

    $12

    per month, billed annually

    Pricing
    BitBarProgress Telerik Fiddler
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Fiddler Everywhere - Pro
    $12
    per month per user
    Fiddler Everywhere - Pro
    $18
    per month per user
    Fiddler Everywhere - Enterprise
    $420
    per year per user
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    BitBarProgress Telerik Fiddler
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsEnterprise packages are available for larger teams and customers.•The price of the Pro monthly plan is $18. •The price of the Pro annual plan is $12 per month, billed annually. •The price of the Enterprise plan is $35 per month, billed annually.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    BitBarProgress Telerik Fiddler
    Considered Both Products
    SmartBear
    No answer on this topic
    Progress Software
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    83%
    Would buy again
    5 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    5 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    6 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    6 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Best Alternatives
    BitBarProgress Telerik Fiddler
    Small Businesses
    TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    Score8.9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    Score8.9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    Score8.9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    BitBarProgress Telerik Fiddler
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.2
    (6 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    BitBarProgress Telerik Fiddler
    Likelihood to Recommend
    SmartBear
    CrossBrowserTesting is a great tool to use when you have a new page or new content that you want to test on an array of devices/browsers. In the diverse online world nowadays, it is nearly impossible to ensure optimization for every case. CBT allows you to get closer to that goal.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Progress Software
    I am a senior software engineer and I have actively made fiddler a requirement for all of our engineers to have on their laptops by default. I have recommended it to all web developers that I have worked with and contractors that I have worked with as it has saved my mental stability on numerous occasions when trying to show people details of various web requests when working on integrations between different systems This is an absolutely fantastic product that I have used in a technical capacity many, many times and I will always suggest it as a tool when someone is debugging specifically but also for initial development to see how the requests are formed and for sharing responses and requests details so that others can recreate the request that you have sent through right down to the smallest detail
    Read full review
    Pros
    SmartBear
    • Allows me to test on our development server with ease which is behind a firewall.
    • Using automation for my tests.
    • Screenshots of the problems on each page.
    • Ability to jump between screen sizes quickly.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Progress Software
    No answers on this topic
    Cons
    SmartBear
    • Test case support is somewhat limited in customization ability.
    • Not a unique problem to them (or their 'fault'), but content behind VPN or intranet cannot be scanned.
    • Pricing with tier level and features can sometimes be confusing (ie. what is and what is not included).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Progress Software
    • The display could potentially become a bit more user-friendly over time, it's pretty easy to follow but for example, I always view the raw request/response information by default and this is not the default selection, being able to choose the default selection would be nice
    • Clearer information and options to reduce 'noise' when viewing the requests, there are often a lot of background requests being sent on a computer, you can filter to roughly see what you want and filter out things that you don't want but there are different types of requests and I can't see how to filter between those - possibly a feature but could be made easier to use potentially
    • Nothing else to put, this is a fantastic product so there isn't much else to suggest at this stage of using it and I have been using fiddler for years now in my role as a software engineer
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    SmartBear
    Selenium: 1. Selenium is Open source tool 2. Needs proper framework development and integration with multiple 3rd party tools 3. Not much secure 4. Needs scripting knowledge for people working on it 5. takes time and effort CrossBrowser Testing: 1. Licensed , so secure 2. Less time , less effort 3. Quick results 4. No scripting language knowledge needed 5. More coverage 6. Without any framework creation also we can test on multiple devices/browsers
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Progress Software
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    SmartBear
    • By using CrossBrowserTesting we are saving many hours a week in manual work hours.
    • Our automated Selenium tests run in a fraction of the time it takes to manually test our components, so we can spend more time building great user experiences and less time triaging bugs.
    Read full review
    Progress Software
    • Overall this tool has sped up the process of integrating with new systems infinitely
    • The cost of fiddler everywhere which is what we use specifically is nothing in comparison to the cost of dev time saved when debugging processes
    • Being able to send information around so simply to other support teams to show them what responses we are getting along with the request detail have made communications much quicker and saves a lot of time going back and forth discussing what is being done and what the request is being sent
    Read full review
    ScreenShots