TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) vs. Tricentis Testim
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) | Score8.9 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | TestMu AI (formerly LambdaTest) is a full-stack, AI-native quality engineering platform that lets teams plan, author, execute and analyse software quality in one place, across web, mobile and AI applications. Performance and load testing: TestMu AI runs JMeter .jmx plans and Gatling simulations unchanged, at protocol level, on managed cloud load generators that are provisioned for each run across six regions and removed when it ends, so there is no load… | $19 per month per user |
Tricentis Testim | Score7.7 out of 10 | N/A | Testim.io, from Tricentis since the February 2022 acquisition, leverages machine learning for the authoring, execution and maintenance of automated test cases. Testim uses dynamic locators and learns with every execution. It is designed to produce fast authoring and stable tests that learn, thus eliminating the need to continually maintain tests with every code change. | $30,000 per year |
| TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) | Tricentis Testim | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Discount available for annual pricing. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) | Tricentis Testim | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
98% Would buy again 105 Answers | 93% Would buy again 13 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
98% Delivers good value for the price 99 Answers | 92% Delivers good value for the price 12 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 107 Answers | 93% Happy with the feature set 13 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
97% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 75 Answers | 78% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 7 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
97% Implementation went as expected 89 Answers | 85% Implementation went as expected 11 Answers | |
| TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) | Tricentis Testim | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | TestComplete Score8 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | No answers on this topic | OpenText UFT One Score8 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | No answers on this topic | SoapUI Open Source Score8.3 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) | Tricentis Testim | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.0 | 7.5 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Usability | 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Availability | 10.0 | - |
| Performance | 9.0 | - |
| Support Rating | 10.0 | 6.6 |
| Implementation Rating | 9.0 | - |
| Configurability | 8.0 | - |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | 9.0 | - |
| Ease of integration | 10.0 | - |
| Product Scalability | 10.0 | - |
| Vendor post-sale | 9.0 | - |
| Vendor pre-sale | 9.0 | - |
| TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) | Tricentis Testim | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
|
|
| Usability |
|
|
| Reliability and Availability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Performance |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Implementation Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Scalability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) Screenshots | Tricentis Testim Screenshots |















