TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    HighQ

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AHighQ Collaborate, now from Thomson Reuters (acquired 2019) is a cloud-based enterprise collaboration platform, featuring secure file sharing but also means for sharing documents with users outside the enterprise, as well as a user-interface optimized for mobile devices and intuitive interface, with real-time communication.N/A

    zeroheight

    Score8 out of 10
    N/Azeroheight helps teams create, manage and maintain their design systems. Using zeroheight, designers, engineers, and product teams can collaborate and build design systems that can be easily shared across teams.

    $49

    month

    Pricing
    HighQzeroheight
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Starter
    $49
    month
    Enterprise
    Custom Pricing
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    HighQzeroheight
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    HighQzeroheight
    Project Management
    Comparison of Project Management features of Thomson Reuters HighQ and zeroheight
    Feature
    Thomson Reuters HighQ
    8.2
    2 Ratings
    6% above category average
    zeroheight
    -
    Ratings
    Task Management8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Scheduling8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Workflow Automation9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile Access9.32 Ratings00 Ratings
    Search9.62 Ratings00 Ratings
    Visual planning tools5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Communication
    Comparison of Communication features of Thomson Reuters HighQ and zeroheight
    Feature
    Thomson Reuters HighQ
    8.6
    2 Ratings
    7% above category average
    zeroheight
    -
    Ratings
    Chat9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Notifications9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Discussions9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Surveys6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Internal knowledgebase10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    File Sharing & Management
    Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Thomson Reuters HighQ and zeroheight
    Feature
    Thomson Reuters HighQ
    9.4
    2 Ratings
    15% above category average
    zeroheight
    -
    Ratings
    Versioning10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Video files9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Audio files9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Document collaboration9.22 Ratings00 Ratings
    Access control9.22 Ratings00 Ratings
    Advanced security features10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    HighQzeroheight
    Small Businesses
    Flock
    Score9.5 out of 10
    M‑Files
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Troop Messenger
    Score9.8 out of 10
    Esker
    Score7.4 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Cisco Business Edition 7000 (discontinued)
    Score9 out of 10
    Tungsten Capture
    Score9.5 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    HighQzeroheight
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.2
    (2 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    HighQzeroheight
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Thomson Reuters
    HighQ Collaborate is well suited to situations where a law firm maintains numerous documents for a client and the client needs access to them on a regular basis. For example, we may store the client's minute book (which is relatively common for a large corporate law firm to do), but the client may need access to documents in that minute book on a regular basis. Likewise, we have an internal system at the firm for hosting digital versions of closing books, however, many clients would not have a similar system because they would only receive closing books irregularly. USBs get lost and the client might not want to put the closing book on the main server where anyone can access it. By putting the closing book on the extranet site, the individuals in the client's organization who should be able to access the closing book can do so.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    zeroheight
    For creating and maintaining a component library, it is a fantastic tool that creates an interface between Developers, UX Engineers and Designers. It is easy to get both general information about a component, but also incredibly detailed information when looking at the component on a pixel-level, where information on paddings, margins, colors, fonts etc. can be easily accessed.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Thomson Reuters
    • Document sharing. This product makes it easy to upload, review and organize documents related to a particular project or matter.
    • Permissions. Collaborate allows very granular permissions to be assigned for shared documents and administrative activities such as workflows.
    • Reliability. The product is cloud-based and rarely, if ever, unavailable.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    zeroheight
    • showcasing components and other topics
    • ease of seeing detailed information on components (colors, paddings, sizes etc.)
    • ease of finding information
    • possibility of going to previous versions of the design guideline
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Thomson Reuters
    • It is just not that exciting. We host documents on there for clients but the extranet sites have ultimately turned out to not be a product that our clients are clamoring for or that we are regularly pushing.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    zeroheight
    • when opening a component image (which opens a new page where the detailed information like paddings and colors are shown), the zoom can only be done by buttons, I'd prefer to be able to use my mouse scroll and for vertical / horizontal scrolling to do ctrl+scroll or ctrl+shift+scroll or something like that
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Thomson Reuters
    The interface is easy to use and overall the software seems pretty robust (I haven't had any crashes yet), so I haven't had to use the support very often. Likewise, I don't think I've ever had a client e-mail me with questions or issues - the software is pretty idiot-proof.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    zeroheight
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Thomson Reuters
    I feel that HighQ does not really have any real competition in this space because it simply accomplishes its goals far better than the competition at lower cost, while requiring less training and administration.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    zeroheight
    I have used and still use Sketch and Zeplin too, but they serve other purposes for us. Sketch is used to design the components themselves and they are then exported to Zeroheight where they are showcased and enriched with textual information. Zeplin is used to design application pages, and again the components are exported to Zeplin from Sketch. But Zeroheight is mainly used for the development of the components themselves as well as a documentation for our design guideline in general. It is also used by us for design tokens and patterns, as well as other information on the design guideline, so if someone wants to understand the "why" of a design decision, the explanation can be usually found in Zeroheight too.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Thomson Reuters
    • Permits fairly simple administration by a single person for hundreds of Extranets
    • One shop stopping for reliable, secure document sharing and signing with external parties
    • Simple enough to use that internal and external users do not need training to take advantage of the product.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    zeroheight
    • increased quality, as less misunderstandings or communication problems occur
    • increased speed of development, as it is a single source of truth for us. The developer can rely on the information in Zeroheight being correct so that he doesn't have to iterate his code again and again.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots