TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Tuskr

    Score9.3 out of 10
    N/ATuskr is a cloud-based test management software. Users can manage test cases, conduct test runs and integrate with bug and time tracking tools. Tuskr is available via a free plan, and with a 30-day free trial of paid tier features.

    $45

    per month 5 users (minimum)

    Visual Studio Test Professional

    Score7 out of 10
    N/AAn add-on for the Visual Studio IDE, Visual Studio Test Professional subscription helps teams drive quality and speed. It includes test case management and collaboration features that streamline quality control and support continuous delivery.

    $2,169

    for the first year (renews at $869)

    Pricing
    TuskrVisual Studio Test Professional
    Editions & Modules
    Team
    $9
    per month per user
    Business
    $15
    per month per user
    Enterprise
    $29
    per month per user
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    TuskrVisual Studio Test Professional
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details16% discount for annual pricing.—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    TuskrVisual Studio Test Professional
    Considered Both Products
    Celoxis
    No answer on this topic
    Microsoft
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    26 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    12 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    24 Answers
    91%
    Delivers good value for the price
    10 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    26 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    12 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    21 Answers
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    9 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    22 Answers
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    12 Answers
    Features
    TuskrVisual Studio Test Professional
    Test Management
    Comparison of Test Management features of Tuskr and Visual Studio Test Professional
    Feature
    Tuskr
    9.7
    25 Ratings
    18% above category average
    Visual Studio Test Professional
    -
    Ratings
    Centralized test management10.024 Ratings00 Ratings
    Test execution reporting9.425 Ratings00 Ratings
    User Ratings
    TuskrVisual Studio Test Professional
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.4
    (26 ratings)
    7.0
    (15 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    9.2
    (5 ratings)
    7.0
    (10 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.5
    (10 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    TuskrVisual Studio Test Professional
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Celoxis
    Tuskr works well for teams that want a straightforward test management solution without a steep learning curve. It's especially useful for Agile projects where frequent testing and collaboration are important. Teams looking for extensive enterprise-level customization or highly advanced reporting may find some limitations, but for day-to-day QA management, it performs very well.
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    It would be well suited if we used it with Azure DevOps as we can effortlessly integrate the test cases and even stories or tasks to stay on track with our work. Those test cases can even be reused across multiple projects. Using any other third-party tools, such as Jira, can be less appropriate, as it's not a Microsoft tool, and its capabilities will be limited.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Celoxis
    • Its easy to import test cases in Tuskr by using the csv import feature
    • Test runs are easy to create and can include test cases from multiple suits.
    • Reports of test runs make it easier to track all the cases that were covered at a particular instance before giving a release signoff.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Availability of the desktop client or the web interface. The web interface being the favorite and providing a better experience.
    • It enables you to write unit tests with so much ease.
    • Allows the recording and repeating of manual tests
    • It can be set up for collaboration.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Celoxis
    • When you click into a specific test, the status automatically clears. it would be nice for this to be preserved when clicking in instead of clearing
    • It would be nice to be able to add comments specific to certain steps in each test, instead of just one big comment box
    • Since we use Tuskr for QA, we structure it as a table with instructions and expected results. because these are side by side, sometimes it is hard to go in a step-by-step order when there are multiple QA steps to take to complete the test.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • The user community of the Visual Studio Test product is weak. For instant problems with this product, it is necessary to quickly reach the source of the error.
    • Licence fees need to be more reasonable. License prices need to be reduced so that they can easily compete with free testing tools.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Celoxis
    Tuskr suits our organization needs
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Celoxis
    The Tuskr App, overall rating depends on its easeiest way to use as their features and managment tool are too good. If you need a easier tool and cost-effective tool and a lot of feature in it. and its return of investment is very good. And the software is really ease to adapt
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    It is very usable if you are familiar with Visual Studio to begin with. If you are new to the interface, it can be a long ramp up period for Testers not used to the GUI. There is always the web option which seems to be more intuitive for many Testers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Celoxis
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    Visual Studio Test Professional is backed up by the full support of the Microsoft Corporation. That means twenty-four/seven customer support by quality, highly-trained professionals who understand every possible issue that you have experienced before. They are nice, efficient, and highly professional. I recommend them.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Celoxis
    I have not worked with related testing suite before but Tuskr has been the favorite platform for running test suites. It has generated positive leads from the company data by offering the necessary testing support. It is easy to integrate with other applications to suit business demands. The system generate results from various testing suites that can shared with our clients.
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    The visual Studio Test tool is faster than other tools. Since the development and testing processes are in one tool, it is more profitable in terms of cost. It is more inconvenient to write a test case in DevOps.
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Celoxis
    • Everyone in the team can go and read how to perform a specific test and note down the result of it which can be viewed by anyone
    • We can filter based on results understanding what test cases are failing from previous runs
    • Helps save a lot of time, effort and minimises future issues
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • One of the positive ROIs of Visual Studios is the fact that it makes producing our work at a quick rate, things like Intellisense make our work get produced at a much higher rate which is good for our return of investment.
    • Testing by the developers has increased by 23%, we now take the time to actually test our product before we send it to our QA people.
    • I am not aware of any negative ROI aspects to our company that have been found.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Tuskr Screenshots

    Screenshot of Progress MonitoringScreenshot of Create Flexible test casesScreenshot of Distribute Workload