Thank you BMC for the great job you do.
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
Pros
- End-to-end ITIL 4 workflows (Incident, Change, Service Request) with full audit trail – essential for ISAE 3402 Type 2 and DORA compliance in the banking sector.
- Centralized customer portal for multi-client operations: client-specific handling with standardized processes – supporting 36,000+ workplaces and 700+ business services.
- Integrated CMDB and ITAM on a single platform – delivers the regulatory transparency required across 5,200+ servers and enables DORA-compliant asset documentation.
Cons
- I answer something, because it is a required question.
Return on Investment
- Operational efficiency (Incident/Problem): Standardized workflows and clear ownership improved triage, escalation, and root-cause tracking across a large service landscape (~700 business services / ~36,000 workplaces). This reduced coordination effort and improved consistency of handling and communication.
- Customer experience via the customer platform/portal: A single entry point for users, increased transparency (status, updates, responsibilities), and enabled more structured intake. This supports the objective of “empowering users” and reduces back-and-forth communication.
- Governance & compliance impact (positive + limiting factors): Helix supports auditable processes needed in a regulated environment (DORA/EBA/NIS2, ISO/ISAE context). ROI is constrained where foundation data is still maturing (CMDB build-up, ITAM data quality) and where strict permissions and heterogeneous integrations increase implementation and ongoing maintenance effort; non-harmonized SLAs add additional overhead.





