ConceptboardPricing

because it was easy to use and easy to adopt by every team member. Also, the pricing model is really very good and adaptable by almost every organization. Secondly

particular tool gave better clearity to the teams working on it. Bit expensive due to its pricing strategy of pay per feature Very convenient and simple to use … Gives no idea about the past implementation of a certain project/ process Expensive as compared to other service providers 7 … design thinking and related fields. This tool on a…

Increase in productivity Cost reduction Efficiency increase

Conceptboard is cheaper than Stormboard. Also, the user interface and reactiveness is slightly better than other team collaboration tools.

easy to use and is very much considerable from the pricing point of view as well because of low cost monthly plans. It is simple and right on point with … Inexpensive as it has low cost monthly plans Collaboration of data from every participant makes it easier

Did not make up the cost of use Progression of some of our bigger ideas outweighed cost Disinterest of some employees in collaborating … Expensive for starter business w/o revenue Difficulty of some staff to adjust to

TAT with respect to integration and implementation. Also, it is a quite cheaper option as compared to its direct competitors. The main reason to select … Price Product Usability … Price - This was the most important factor as we were just jumping

advanced users. We selected Conceptboard as a short-term solution that was low-cost compared to Miro but allowed users to create boards. Once users are versed