Related Quote from Verified User
because it was easy to use and easy to adopt by every team member. Also, the pricing model is really very good and adaptable by almost every organization. Secondly
Conceptboard is a collaboration software built for teams of any size. Its primary features are project management, team whiteboards, integration into business workflows, and real-time collaboration.
The following is a quick overview of editions offered by other software in similar categories
Miro provides a visual workspace for innovation that enables distributed teams of any size to dream, design, and build the future together. Today, Miro counts more than 60 million users in 200,000 organizations who use Miro to improve product development collaboration, to speed up time to market,…
Bluescape is a cloud-based, software as a service company based in Silicon Valley, CA, that provides a digital whiteboard of the same name.
Allo is a remote workspace made for asynchronous communication and remote teams. With interactive and visual spaces, teams are able to collaborate around, strategy, design, proposals, initiatives, and processes. This is done with Allo's interactive spaces.Allo includes:Creating interactive documents…
because it was easy to use and easy to adopt by every team member. Also, the pricing model is really very good and adaptable by almost every organization. Secondly
particular tool gave better clearity to the teams working on it. Bit expensive due to its pricing strategy of pay per feature Very convenient and simple to use … Gives no idea about the past implementation of a certain project/ process Expensive as compared to other service providers 7 … design thinking and related fields. This tool on a…
Increase in productivity Cost reduction Efficiency increase
Conceptboard is cheaper than Stormboard. Also, the user interface and reactiveness is slightly better than other team collaboration tools.
easy to use and is very much considerable from the pricing point of view as well because of low cost monthly plans. It is simple and right on point with … Inexpensive as it has low cost monthly plans Collaboration of data from every participant makes it easier
Did not make up the cost of use Progression of some of our bigger ideas outweighed cost Disinterest of some employees in collaborating … Expensive for starter business w/o revenue Difficulty of some staff to adjust to
TAT with respect to integration and implementation. Also, it is a quite cheaper option as compared to its direct competitors. The main reason to select … Price Product Usability … Price - This was the most important factor as we were just jumping
advanced users. We selected Conceptboard as a short-term solution that was low-cost compared to Miro but allowed users to create boards. Once users are versed