IBM Video Streaming Pricing

“Perhaps if you are not using premium features like overlays and some of the other bells whistles, you could break things up into a more basic package, say $19 or $29 per month. … Yes, we are still trying to find the right price to charge and trying to figure out the best perks on our end, but live streaming is going to be a big part of what we do for matches and interviewing...”

“Having a high peak of concurrent views while containing the global cost of a streaming service allows us to guarantee a great visibility to sponsors to an affordable price for a sports association...”

“If budget is important then IBM Watson proved to more cost-effective than services advertising lower initial cost.”

“Save your money and look elsewhere if you're budget is below $20K per year for a live/VOD platform for your company.].”

“There are less expensive options and my tech team would prefer to use a different platform just so our budget would have $12K to put to a new sound board, computers, cameras... … A smaller company can use it and use a package geared to their budget.”

“It means your platform can be used with professional cameras with nothing but a BLACKMAGIC web presenter or a BLACKMAGIC ATEM Mini, both of which are cheap and affordable.”

“Pricing is also important as there are a number of players in the market that offer these additional features at a lesser cost point.”

“It used to be cheaper for more service, now it's more expensive, extra functions that were previously available included are extra charges, and the terrible unreliable service is still the same.”

“IBM video streaming has been reliable, easy to use, and provides a reasonable price on a student media budget.”

“Price - actually the price is lower than Wowza or Nadaje.com here in Poland.”

“Channel-based architecture and cost structure make it difficult to implement corporate-wide; limited ability to create customized channels for each department without incurring significant cost.”