MatillionPricing

Reduces development time and enables the developers to focus on delivering value for Sophos.

I think the price could be a bit cheaper.

because of hard limits on EC2 instance hosting. It is expensive considering the infrastructure cost is added to Redshift costs. Matillion does not scale … work upon. It is also easily integratable with AWS; however, if you have cost constraints it may seem a challenge.

The step of transformation is not 100% clear. The price could be better. Their forum is not that good.

is possible the "pay for use." If you don't trigger Matillion, switch off cost are considered also if no job is running.

much more flexibility than the other products we tested, at a much lower price point. Other products, in my view, had a cleaner/simpler UI but I also felt … tools that did have equivalent flexibility/functionality were a lot more expensive than Matillion.

monitoring cost is involved. … It has valued money as

and can be hosted in AWS or Azure. You only get charged per hour so it is cost-effective if set up correctly.

refresh schedules Requires little maintenance or support from the team Affordable and scalable ETL solution … easily integrates with Snowflake which is a huge selling point. It is also affordable fro the amount of data source connections that it comes with.

various sources including AWS S3, sFTP and various databases connection. In Pricing, the matillion option has economical than Informatica with our usage and … moving away from legacy system towards matillion it offered some significant cost on matillion hosting and licensing part but we were able to save some on … system hosting but majority of saving where on people re…

your data is stored on-premise. If you don't use AWS, you won't get as much value out of it. Also, in environments with large teams and lots of developers … wouldn't get enough benefit from an upgrade to warrant the cost. I appreciate that Matillion valued our business and the benefits we get from their product … your data is stored on-premise. If you don't use AWS, you won't get as…

job monitor console Flexibility for supporting scripting languages Expensive license fees … License fees are expensive.

we want to transform. It is expensive considering the infrastructure cost is added to Redshift costs, so the overall value for analytics is something we … benefits of having a range of integration features. Considering the annual cost is almost equivalent to a junior engineer, we could spend the time to manually … tiers, the added investment is hard to measu…

The pricing increased dramatically by 30% with short notice. This obviously hurt the

new users, reaching productive output in a few hours, is a key part of the value proposition. That it is usable by a wide range of skill levels is testament

Not a high ROI, as it is a high-priced service--more even for start-ups Jobs can get done fast. Delivering is a … are made faster. It requires infrastructure monitoring, another "hidden" cost.

Slightly over priced for a startup. I feel support is a bit slow. Not all the libraries are installed … pretty scalable, you just need to weigh the run speed of your task verses cost when you scale-up the machine.

great tool that was considered, but Matillion was chosen as it is younger, cheaper and specific to Redshift. Jenkins is another tool we used. It is very reliable

community and technical support, very responsive account team, license cost, and pricing model. … learn, and requires minimal maintenance. With a small IT team, we cannot afford to compromise in any of the aspects, as the company’s entire dataload depen…

Customer response time needs improving SAAS model instead of charging hourly Lack of documentation Versioning logs not updated

Cost is okay, but is going up significantly soon. Value proposition is dwindling … of a cloud-based solution, right? We can scale up if needed, although the cost jumps pretty significantly. And we can always add more d…

stack, which has transformed how we use data to make business decisions. The value is immense, though hard to quantify in a review.

Fast - easy to use Flexible - data ingress and back-end data stores Cost-effective - easy to start small and scale up

jobs would still run on executions. This might be caused by the default values of environment variables being NULL.

Google Sheets data. Utilizes SQL well. Supports custom API data sources. Pricing is by server size not # of data sources or volume. … Big positive on price. Lack of documentation and training makes ramping up difficult. Source control