Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) Review
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) Reviews and Ratings
Community insights
TrustRadius Insights for Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, third party data sources.
Pros
Efficiency, Scalability, and Versatility Appreciation: Reviewers have consistently praised Red Hat Enterprise Linux - RHEL for its efficiency in operations, scalability to meet varying demands, and versatile nature demonstrated through seamless integration with middleware components like JBoss.
Reliability and Security Acknowledgment: Users value the reliability of RHEL, emphasizing its consistent performance track record and high level of security maintained over time. They appreciate the presence of built-in security measures, regular updates, and compatibility with tools such as Ansible for easy deployment.
Excellent Support Recognition: Many users have highlighted the outstanding support provided by Red Hat without specifying individual names or personally identifying information. They mention the support team's helpfulness and responsiveness via chat or email channels.
Reviews
Videos
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) - platform for the future
Rating: 8 out of 10
IncentivizedUse Cases and Deployment Scope
We use close to 100 Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) servers in our Org and are primarily used make certain product deployment and configuration easier. For example, we have observed the PostgreSQL database performance on Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)is a lot better than other operating systems. Also the in-built volume manager and ext file system are easy to configure and setup. This is just one example, but in certain deployments, this is the best platform.
Pros
- Easy to setup OS with one of the best volume manager and FS
- Best performance for certain databases
- Less vulnerabilities and secure
- Minimal CPU and memory usage for the OS
Cons
- Steps to setup volumes and ext FS can be done easier
- Rescan new disks or the extended disks can be made easier
- Few features can be integrated in a wizard based format to make new users easy
- License modeling can be made easier
Likelihood to Recommend
We use close to 100 Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) servers in our Org and are primarily used make certain product deployment and configuration easier. For example, we have observed the PostgreSQL database performance on Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) is a lot better than other operating systems. Also the in-built volume manager and ext file system are easy to configure and setup. This is just one example, but in certain deployments, this is the best platform.
Vetted Review
15 years of experience
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) Stability Security and Strategic ROI
Rating: 9 out of 10
IncentivizedUse Cases and Deployment Scope
In our organization, Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) serves as the foundational OS across a significant portion of our critical IT infrastructure. We leverage Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) for its renowned stability, security, and performance, making it a cornerstone of our enterprise architecture. High availability and performance are very much important, and that is the business problem Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) addressed in our case.
Pros
- High availability & performance
- Easy scalability
Cons
- I have seen few compatibility issues with third-party applications. That can be addressed to improve the usablity.
- It will be great if the upgrades for most used developer tools are pushed little quicker.
Likelihood to Recommend
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) is really great for high performance and availability type of business requirements.
Vetted Review
3 years of experience
Standard option for linux
Rating: 7 out of 10
IncentivizedUse Cases and Deployment Scope
We have thousands of VMs running Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) to support all kind of applications, monitoring tools and databases. Splunk, tenable, mongodb, cyberark to name a few.
Pros
- cheaper alternative OS from AIX / HPUX
- run all kind of apps and tools
- suitable for cloud environments
Cons
- transparent OS upgrade method
- improved LVM (logical volume manager)
- improved cluster
Likelihood to Recommend
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) is well suited for cloud environments, fast deployments and to run non-intensive apps/tools (with low memory and low cpu consumption).Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) might not be suited for really huge databases and intensive CPU processing.
Vetted Review
20 years of experience
RHEL
Rating: 8 out of 10
IncentivizedUse Cases and Deployment Scope
We use RHEL as our primary OS in the datacenter. It’s stable, secure, and reliable for running critical apps. It helps us stay compliant, automate tasks with Ansible, and maintain consistency across all environments. It’s the solid foundation we need to run smoothly and scale confidently.
Pros
- Stability
- Security
- Consistency
Cons
- Desktop environments.
- Subscription and licensing process.
Likelihood to Recommend
RHEL is an excellent fit for datacenter environments—it’s reliable, secure, and stable, making it ideal for running critical infrastructure and services. However, it’s less suited for end-user desktop environments, where the interface and experience can be challenging for non-technical users or those coming from Windows or macOS.
Vetted Review
3 years of experience
Secured Enterprise environment
Rating: 9 out of 10
IncentivizedUse Cases and Deployment Scope
We consider Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) OS as one of the most secure and stable OS for all enterprise task and software management. We use this for software deployment , testing , official files management and as a backup server system as well. Just perfect for VMs as it highly support and easily to install and start.
Pros
- Super secure and perfectly manageable file system.
- Compatible almost in every hypervisor to create VMs and provide stable environment.
- Memory management for enterpise task is quite well and compatible too.
Cons
- GUI can be a little more detailed and more customized.
- Complex to start and learn as a begineer due to dependency on CLI more.
- For small enterprise, it is expensive, so they can include a version for them too.
Likelihood to Recommend
OS installation is quick and easy. Stability and reliability is top notch and unbeatable by other OS for managing enterpise files structure and task. Very professional work and support as well by company.
Red Hat
Rating: 8 out of 10
IncentivizedUse Cases and Deployment Scope
We use RHEL in all aspects of our business.
Pros
- RHEL does a lot things well depending on how it is configured. So I would say RHEL excels at being flexible.
- RHEL is a very stable operating system and is easy to maintain when properly configured and used.
- RHEL is a secure OS when all the proper configurations are in place.
Cons
- I have had issues with RHEL corrupting when being patched online and then the OS loses network connectivity.
- SELinux with MLS does not have much documentation and is a pain to get working.
Likelihood to Recommend
RHEL can be a great production server when configured properly, it is very flexible and can be used in many different scenarios whether it be a web server, file server, database server, or a load balancer. RHEL is less appropriate in end user environment where the use needs to do daily office work tasks although it still can be done.
Vetted Review
5 years of experience
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 2025
Rating: 10 out of 10
IncentivizedUse Cases and Deployment Scope
In our organization, Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) is the core OS (operating system) for our software development environment. Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) gives a secure and stable foundation for building and deploying applications.
Pros
- Performance optimization of system workloads
- Stable and predictable environment
- Hardened security features like SELinux, FIPS, FAPolicy
Cons
- More support for offline (air gapped) environments
Likelihood to Recommend
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) is ideal for software development in secure environments, mission critical apps or even just end user desktop use
If Linux it is Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Rating: 9 out of 10
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
Half of our VMs in DC are Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
Pros
- App servers
- DB servers
- Proxy servers
- Web servers
Cons
- Minor and major upgrade operations
Likelihood to Recommend
In the big size enterprises it is important to use a stable and well supported version of an OS and Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) is one of them
Vetted Review
7 years of experience
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) Review
Rating: 10 out of 10
IncentivizedUse Cases and Deployment Scope
We use it for everything to include virtualization and container hosting.
Pros
- It's Linux. It's better than Windows. Everything's positive over Windows.
- Speed.
- Efficiency.
- Security.
- Reliability.
Cons
- I don't believe there's any real reason to improve the product. It's great as it is.
Likelihood to Recommend
Anything that is requiring a secure environment or anything dealing with cybersecurity. This is the product to use.
Vetted Review
32 years of experience
Red Hat Enterprise Linux RHEL Review
Rating: 8 out of 10
IncentivizedUse Cases and Deployment Scope
It's providing application support for engineers.
Pros
- Usability is pretty easy.
- Configuration management isn't always difficult depending on what it is.
- Account creations are definitely easy
- File management
Cons
- If there was possibly, I think there's a GUI, but I'm not sure. But the FA policy service probably needs a GUI. Easier incorporation between R seven and RL eight products.
Likelihood to Recommend
The installation of certain applications is pretty easy, especially with the DNF and YAML repositories.
Vetted Review
7 years of experience
