Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)Pricing

cheaper alternative OS from AIX / HPUX run all kind of apps and tools suitable for … It is cheaper and widely used, and in some cases even better OS (then Solaris for example)

a begineer due to dependency on CLI more. For small enterprise, it is expensive, so they can include a version for them too.

It's a positive impact at our bottom line. It's been cheaper to deploy, quicker to deploy.

the decision about using one or other linux distribution is related to the cost of subscriptions, level of criticity of the system, and support requirements

High subscription cost Time to adopt latest packages Dependency on red hat ecosystem

Secure application environment. Low cost and easy deployment of application with easy OS installation too. Stable

Cost if little high but features are worth it. Learning curve is too large for

Hardly any downtime Low overhead for maintenance Cost can sometimes be perceived as high

Cost of license is too high for everyone to purchase. Most of the configs are

pricing

Extensive support expensive for value … Good value

Linux always has some inherent difficulty for the layman Cost can be associated to use compared to free distros Red Hat insights can produce

Value on investment Testing

Price has been pretty constistent It has been easy to train new employees on Red

Cost Cost of keeping old system can not think more

price support UI

products like Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 8 & 9. One of the great value of Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) products are they are super reliability

Positive impact since we are getting License cheap Most of our Applications installed and migrated to Red Hat Enterprise Linux

pricing models audit control

Pricing is expensive. Licensing is confusing and expensive. Product quality is great, excellent customer … Licensing confusion Pricing 8 … It is essentially balancing between price vs stability and support. For enterprises generally the CE editions don't work out.

Licensing clarify Patch timeliness Pricing

Positive: Ease of renewing subscriptions, and the low cost of subscriptions Positive: Providing a standard development environment for

Moving from Unix to Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) reduced the cost Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) provided the support needed to take advantage

exploring Ubuntu as an option. Red Hat is more robust but Ubuntu may offer cost savings,

Enterprise Linux (RHEL) in 2012, and we saved a lot of money in OS licensing fees and hardware costs since then.