Scalability: Several users have praised Relativity for its scalability, noting that it can handle a large number of documents, reviewers, and cases. This capability makes it ideal for organizations dealing with significant data volumes and complex review processes.
Customizability: Reviewers appreciate the ability to customize Relativity to support various workflows and integrate with third-party tools. This flexibility allows users to tailor the software to their specific needs and enhance their overall productivity.
Security: Users value the high level of security provided by Relativity when dealing with sensitive and confidential documents. The secure environment gives peace of mind to users, ensuring that their data remains protected throughout the review process.
Relativity is used primarily to conduct legal, regulatory and internal investigation document reviews within our organisation.
Relativity is well suited to running document reviews
In cases involving massive datasets (I.e. regulatory investigations, cross-border litigation), Relativity's powerful search, deduplication, and technology-assisted review features enable fast, accurate identification of relevant documents. For example, we used it in a front-running investigation involving a large asset management firm, where Relativity streamlined data review across multiple custodians. There are multiple use case available.
I use it for document review. It’s a great platform.I manage a team of attorneys who use it. We like the tagging feature and email threading feature. The similar documents is good too. It’s for a large number of documents. Only issue is log in problems occasionally. Productions are easy.
The tagging and threading function is great! It helped me find useful documents for depositions. The production time allowed me to get out two big productions to opposing counsel on time. The customer service is great. The review platform is easy to use and downloading documents is fast. My team can share documents easily.
We use it for some of our legal matters to manage electronic documents.
We like to use Relativity for small and large matters. It is extremely rare that I would think of using another eDiscovery platform. We conduct PII reviews for one of our service lines. We use another software called Canopy which has much more suitable features.
Our organization uses Relativity to have it as a platform for all eDiscovery-related work and presents this platform to more than 1000 clients for their electronic evidence, documents processing, coding decisions, review, analytics, and all other eDiscovery related counsel work. It is a very robust platform for hosting documents, various kinds of files, audio, etc. It has lots of analytics and processing prowess, very detailed in-depth review features, and granular security controls for access of specific objects and things to particular groups or individuals.
Relativity is well suited for all the eDiscovery workflows. It's excellent for document review, coding, active learning, content and structured analytics, searches, persistent highlights, imaging, and burning redactions into productions. The error rates with processing in Relativity are a little compared to other eDiscovery processing tools in the market. It is solely for document review purposes legal scenarios or otherwise, but it is not a complete solution for building customized hosting nor neither it is a replacement for conventional websites.
I use it as Admin to perform the task as per my job profile. In terms of problem-solving, I use it for Processing data and producing the data for our clients. I use it daily to do the tasks assigned to me and we support our clients in all their requirements and use the power of relativity for Providing managed services at times.
If I have to specify some scenarios based on my experience with relativity would be well suited because of its ability to provide data in a presentable manner and play around with data is easy. It is a good platform to perform work with both efficiency and effectiveness.
I use Relativity as an online document management system. It's used to store document collections, review documents for privilege and responsiveness, redact and produce documents and native files. Also used for document searches and review for preparations for upcoming depositions. Create and download collections of documents and native files for review and use as deposition exhibits.
For the most part, Relativity is fairly easy to learn and use on a daily basis. Like most programs and platforms, you can learn to streamline usage, features, and results/downloads with more users over time. Just be careful how with multiple users in a document database, you have to make sure everyone knows NOT to make any edits or changes to tags and collections that others have set up.
Relativity is used to review electronic discovery documents. It allows users to sort, group, and mark documents so they can be labelled and accessed later by others by searching keywords or labels.
Relativity is particularly well suited for large electronic discovery matters where a lawyer is attempting to sort through thousands of documents in a short period of time.
Relativity is primarily used by my organization in two separate workflows: 1) cull/filter data, 2) review client data for production and prepare productions AND review of in-bound productions from opposing counsel
It's well suited for culling/filtering data, review and production of data.
It's not well suited for organizations who don't have expertise administering a similar product and/or infrastructure to support the tool