ReadyAPIFormerly SoapUI Pro, LoadUI Pro, & ServiceV ProPricing

Only supports Groovy script Licensing cost Limited options available to generate data using Data source … Investment Easy to integrate with CI/CD tools such as Jenkins, Git etc Licensing cost is a bit on higher side which impacts the project budget

helpful. Adding contract testing feature to the toolset will improve the value immensely.

The pricing was very advantageous and the software publisher had sales offices in our

ROI has been minimal and not worth the renewal fee … Postman is simpler and super less expensive than ReadyAPI. In addition, the product continues

positive which saves our time on testing Licensing cost is bit expensive Due to the cost, not everyone can afford this product and hence we had to go with free

Easy to write REST requests Easy to get values from the responses between multiple test steps Easy to copy existing test

only provides value (for the cost) if you leverage the whole suite. If you're looking for something lightweight, that can start providing value right away … development, maintenance. But there is a significant cost associated with this investment. and because of this cost…

Frankly speaking, license cost is too high Saves much time and manual effort for regression Saves much time

When using Forms within a Test Step, doesn't also keep the values entered

knowledge for simple cases. LoadUI Pro is good for load testing but is quite expensive when [there are a] lot of free options are available.

results much faster with better accuracy and thus delivering faster business value to our customers.

driven testing, which postman doesn't provide, via tables of known test values against automated API testing. Postman is manual. We also didn't want to … Price Product Features Product Usability

By defining variables, you can customize parameter values without hard coding the values in the whole test-case. You can also use external data sheets … Price Product Features Product Reputation Prior Experience w…

automation capabilities in our services testing. Overall the tool adds a great value to our business.

Tad bit expensive than their competitors. No helpful with Web UI Testing and mobile app testing … performance definitely increased by using SoapUI pro. This is a little more expensive than the competitors.

customers. Optimized the team's overall performance and reduce the resources cost. It provides various inbuilt tool to test the web services.

confusing as it does not show any hit. It should allow sending the null value in request XML tags.

suites in the ui, you'd expect the same for globals and environment settings. Cost for pro license...seems a bit much for an annual license, if you are only … assured, where I define the scope and depth of my automation. But it's got a value that can only be measure by your…

that has most similarity. The only advantage of these alternative is the price (all are free); But SoapUI also offers free versions as well that still can

Website (smartbear.com) should have a lower renewal fee. There should be a organization license.

it has also improved in the recent years, which is a great indicator of value that is put on the need for solid support for customers. Any tool is basically

Cost, and ease of use.

Less defects make it out of test environments Low Cost on Licensing

Compared with HP Service Test: selected SoapUI as it was way cheaper and easier to learn . Also, I always had bad customer service experience … Price Product Features Product Usability Third-party Reviews

Reduced the cost to complete deployment and perform acceptance testing Increased the ability