SpotfirePricing

the application as it provides much functionality. The cost of implementation and usage is expensive compared to other tools. The complexity. Data governance

Expensive license. Performance issues on the large datasets. Users look for more

Spotfire has been incredibly beneficial, with increased productivity and cost reductions helping to positively influence our business objectives.

High cost required for licensing and maintenance, especially for smaller organizations

the high cost of license purchase

i use it to make fast and accurate pricing decisions being able to live link external data for commodity pricing and overlay it with my internal sequal … faster time to market improved productivity from data analysts accurate pricing decisions

Embedded Streaming Capability Pricing Model Version Control

a line graph on multiple bar graphs and then be able to switch the data values to look at, zoom in/out, and plenty of other things.

Makes analysis quick which saves time Cost overhead in terms of data storage Has a learning curve for best implementation

service availability SaaS price

SaaS assistance or support in Spain could be better Cost … agreement. Fast deploiment when standarising analytics. Very good perceived value by end clients. Reliable and available.

several groups using Spotfire. In pricing team, we used it to identify outlines of costs, material purchased price, others. … For analysing price data and providing price recommendation, Spotfire is well suited to identify outliers … Cost Handling and consumption of…

The results were okay, although you always need to take into account the cost related to changing a workflow from what people are used to. In particular

maintaining all of the data that the various stakeholders rely on, the person in charge of marketing communications, our online advertising manager (which includes

which you can make very easily with Business Objects ( a lot of numeric values on a page, with a small lettersize) is not easy to do and it doesn't look … which you can make very easily with Business Objects ( a lot of numeric values on a page, with a small lettersize) is…

For small companies, Spotfire is expensive to get into. Other players are more cost-conscious. There is a huge learning curve to start … Cheaper, easy Office integration, faster deployment, but more complex to develop

other applications in the market provide better user experience its Value for money

at start, but becomes cost effective at large scale. In short, while considering cost; consider cost over the time rather than cost at the time. … will be better to evaluate the prices across different offerings. For example, Spotfire in AWS was a good choice from price and implementation point at start … Low…

Geospatial data works especially well, as the geospatial analytics capability afforded by Spotfire is second to none. We have migrated many workflows that were

Instead of expensive and long process of traditional DWH whose req. are often change to subject, we use SF to gather data, enrich the data, analyze and

newer features what spotfire is bring is good, bt that has not added any value to our day to day work..so 70% impacted in a positive direction, do giving

Cost reduction we save about 10% compared to Microsoft Clarity in data analysis

generating reports, metrics, charts, and graphs. Comes with appropriate costing model at least for an average size organization

that it does everything we needed from Spotfire at a substantially lower price and increased ease of use. … available to others on the team. It's a fine product, it's just more expensive and harder to manage than its competitors.

It is being used in three areas. Advanced Analytics, Pricing, and Marketing. Across the three business units Spotfire is an analytics tool, whereas Tableau … Positive impact on pricing to complete advanced analytics. Improved our efficiency by smoothly exporting