Zepel

Efficient and Easy to Use: Users have found Zepel to be a quick and efficient tool that allows them to move around the software easily. Several reviewers appreciated that there is no need to spend time on configurations or face a steep learning curve while using Zepel. The simplicity and ease of use of Zepel's interface have been praised, with users finding it simple to navigate and resembling a document-like experience.

Seamless Collaboration Across Teams: Many users value Zepel's ability to have multiple Boards within a Project, each dedicated to a different team. This feature enables seamless collaboration and efficient tracking of work across multiple teams. Reviewers appreciate how this functionality helps in managing projects and tracking progress within specific teams as well as overall project coordination.

Great Customer Support: Users have expressed their satisfaction with the great support team at Zepel. They found the customer support helpful and were pleased with the prompt resolution of any issues they encountered when reaching out for assistance.

Limited API and Mobile App Support: Several users have expressed disappointment with the lack of public APIs and a mobile app. They feel that while there are integrations available, they would prefer more powerful integrations and the ability to track time. Some users specifically mentioned that time tracking is missing and hope that it will be added soon. Another user mentioned that a mobile app would be beneficial for their on-the-go team, allowing them to capture and update task statuses more effectively.

Lack of Full API Integration: Some users have raised concerns about the limited support for APIs and third-party integrations. They desire the capability to integrate Zepel with other services beyond the existing options. Although they were informed by support that API development is in progress, they consider full API integration as a valuable feature currently missing from the tool.

Dependency Management Limitation: Users have mentioned the need for better dependency management in Zepel. They find it inconvenient that there is no built-in functionality to set dependencies between different user stories and tasks. While some users work around this limitation using subtasks, they emphasize the importance of being able to easily see dependencies between user stories.

Users have made several recommendations based on their experiences with Zepel. The most common recommendations are:

1. Try out Zepel properly and go through their product guide for a better understanding. Users suggest taking the time to learn how to use Zepel effectively before fully implementing it within a team. By familiarizing yourself with the tool and its features, you can maximize its potential and make the most out of your project management.

2. Play around with Zepel before involving team members. Users recommend exploring Zepel's functionalities and experimenting with different features individually before bringing in the entire team. This allows you to get a feel for the tool and understand how it fits into your workflow before introducing it to others.

3. Ensure that your team is ready for a switch before making the transition to Zepel. Users advise evaluating your team's needs and readiness for a new project management tool before making the switch. It's essential to consider factors such as training requirements, adaptability, and compatibility with existing processes to ensure a smooth transition and successful adoption of Zepel.

By following these recommendations, users believe that individuals and teams can make the most out of Zepel as a lightweight and developer-friendly project management solution that brings the entire team together.