Item: Adobe Stock
Rating: 8
Author: Verified User

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

I use Adobe Stock to find relevant base images for creating ads for various platforms and placements - this supplements and/or replaces creative provided by client-side designers.

Pros and Cons

Image subject variety
Ability to search for specific image types
Image quality

Granularity of searchable image tags
Image sizing/formatting

Most Important Features

Image variety
Search functionality and granularity
Image quality

Return on Investment

Faster ad creative development
Value-add for my clients that don't have design bandwidth

Adobe Stock is comparable in features and selection to other entry-level image sources but has pricing that is affordable for entry-level and small-scale users. It's very simple to get started and doesn't complicate work that is already outside of my core competency.

Key Insights

Do you think Adobe Stock delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with Adobe Stock's feature set?

Yes

Did Adobe Stock live up to sales and marketing promises?

Yes

Did implementation of Adobe Stock go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy Adobe Stock again?

Yes

Other Software Used

Facebook Business Manager, LinkedIn Marketing Solutions, Google Ad Manager

Likelihood to Recommend

Adobe Stock is useful for small-scale applications where a specific type of image is needed rather than a specific image. This eliminates some of the time and cost associated with designing for advertising. Adobe Stock would be cost-ineffective for large-scale applications or where extremely specific imagery is needed.

Good for Small-Scale Applications

Overall Satisfaction with Adobe Stock