Great breadth of stock and template options, needs a lower price tier for individuals
July 12, 2022
Great breadth of stock and template options, needs a lower price tier for individuals
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Adobe Stock
I use Adobe Stock for stock photos, textures, illustrator brushes, and Photoshop templates. I don’t use it for all projects but it is particularly helpful for clients who require photography in their advertising. I find it helpful when I need textures in Illustrator and have also used it for 3D assets used within Dimension.
- Well-indexed and tagged stock photos
- Vector assets
- Strong photography
- More clearly separate the premium assets from standard license ones.
- Maybe get rid of the asset tiers within Adobe stock.
- More 3D assets
- Photography
- Vector assets
- Tenplates
- Helped me provide higher quality stock options in my designs for clients in a variety of industries.
- Saved me time in developing vector concepts
- Helped me expand my breadth of design concepts
IStock doesn’t have the breadth of assets that Adobe has, and doesn’t have an accessible price point for individuals to pay a monthly subscription rate for its photo and other assets.Unsplash and Pexels have decent options for stock photography and texture backgrounds, but can be difficult to search. Pixabay has a less refined selection with lower quality assets—I typically don’t use it for the amount of time it takes to find a good asset.
Do you think Adobe Stock delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Adobe Stock's feature set?
Yes
Did Adobe Stock live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Adobe Stock go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Adobe Stock again?
Yes