Ambassador is great!
Software Version
Starter,Emerging,Professional,Enterprise,Custom
Overall Satisfaction with Ambassador
Currently, we use Ambassador as a secondary ingress controller. It addresses our needs by facilitating adding dynamic routes for our incredible number of endpoints. That way it makes it very easy to get multiple parallel microservices we need to be deployed to support our testing and quality assurance needs.
- Simple syntax
- Easy to understand
- Easy to install
- Documentation is not updated
- Implementing external authentication doesn't always work as described in the documentation
- The Administration console is limited
- Reduced downtime by redirecting traffic between DC.
- Reduced engineering time, don't have to dedicate 1 person to manage it.
- Increased training costs in the short term.
They both offer about the same in terms of end goal and purpose of use and scenarios. However, Ambassador does way better in terms of simplifying the syntax and makes offer a little bit more of control by adding the concepts of hosts, mappings while staying away from a hard to read single file configuration.
Do you think Ambassador Referral Marketing Platform (discontinued) delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Ambassador Referral Marketing Platform (discontinued)'s feature set?
Yes
Did Ambassador Referral Marketing Platform (discontinued) live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Ambassador Referral Marketing Platform (discontinued) go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Ambassador Referral Marketing Platform (discontinued) again?
Yes