Great product, with lots of next generation features.
Updated June 02, 2023
Great product, with lots of next generation features.
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software
Cisco ASA is [our] organization's firewall product, which is used as [a] firewall [and] to support remote VPN connectivity. It secures the perimeter and remote users. With Cisco ASA we have layer 3 and 4 security based on IP addresses and ports. Also with next-generation Cisco ASA antimalware, antispyware, antispam, [and] cloud-based URL filtering are also utilized.
Pros
- Secure the perimeter
- Secure remote users
- Secure network from unauthorized connections initiated from outside
- Secure from zero day attacks
Cons
- Cisco ASA can have better GUI compared with other firewall vendors.
- Cisco can make its security cloud better.
- Cisco has positive impact as security is a integrated part of enterprise.
- Cisco has great support, in less time you can resolve issues, which also has [a] positive impact.
Cisco ASA is doing well, has [a] lot of documents available, [and easy] implementation, however, other vendors are also very easy to deploy. Cisco ASA has [a] great support team. Cisco ASA is truly [a] next-generation product. Now it is cloud-managed, along with zero-touch provisioning(ZTP). Cisco ASA is integrated with Cisco FTD which makes it centrally controlled.
Do you think Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software's feature set?
Yes
Did Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software again?
Yes
Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software Feature Ratings
Resilience and Reliability
Cisco ASA is great and trustable product when it comes to cybersecurity and I felt environment is more secure behind the ASA Firewall. It has stopped couple of attacks with tighter access lists. With great Network Address Translation support ASA has helped keeping internal enterprise network private. Cisco has great support which really helped in easily recovering from network outages.
Cisco ASA active-passive implementation really helped in keeping the network very highly available.
And with context mode feature we can utilise both ASA devices in active-active, so keeping both devices distributing the load equally and utilising the investment in more smarter way.
Cisco ASA active-passive implementation really helped in keeping the network very highly available.
And with context mode feature we can utilise both ASA devices in active-active, so keeping both devices distributing the load equally and utilising the investment in more smarter way.
More investment is needed when talking about cybersecurity, its not where we need to think about saving capex or opex. As this is very important today to secure the infrastructure, end users, remote users as attack surface is really widened, its not just one way entry, today enterprises are open to work from anywhere, which gives bad user a bigger and larger attack surface.
- Network Virtual Appliance
- Hardware Firewall
- Perimeter Security
- Department saperation
- Tenant saperation
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation