Item: Conductor Website Monitoring
Rating: 10
Author: Hans Buis

Overall Satisfaction with ContentKing

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use it two ways; content auditing for websites and keeping track of changes done (intentionally or by stubborn customers).

Pros and Cons

Pros

Audit trail.
Content technical audit.

Cons

None so far.

Return on Investment

I saves me time by the audit.
I have evidence to customer when they say they 'really didn't change any.'
It provides a roadmap.

The UX is amazing on the tool, the monthly price is doable. I use SEMRush for keyword research, Ahrefs for link profiles and ContentKing for audit and history. They all have their specific strong points.

Support Rating

They say in their chat they have a reaction time of some hours, but I always had a reaction within 10 minutes and also a very complete answer, they went the extra mile. It's just almost hard to believe they have a support level this high. It's not what we're used to anymore.

Usability

Like every software it has a learning path, but their approach is fresh and easy to learn.

Key Insights

Do you think Conductor Website Monitoring delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with Conductor Website Monitoring's feature set?

Yes

Did Conductor Website Monitoring live up to sales and marketing promises?

Yes

Did implementation of Conductor Website Monitoring go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy Conductor Website Monitoring again?

Yes

Other Software Used

SEMRush, Ahrefs Site Explorer

Likelihood to Recommend

I use Contentking as a specific tool for audits and keeping track of changes. The latter was how I was looking for software and found out about ContentKing. I did not know at that time they were also very good in reporting or using it as an audit tool.

Conductor Website Monitoring Feature Ratings

Comments

Please log in to join the conversation

Was looking for a tool which would keep an -automatic- history of edits. But they go well beyond this point and it's my new go-to audit tool.