1. Home
  2. Civil Engineering Software
  3. GeoHECRAS Reviews
  4. User Review of GeoHECRAS
GeoHECRAS is the Current and the Future
April 19, 2022

GeoHECRAS is the Current and the Future

Deveshan Govender | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with GeoHECRAS

We use GeoHECRAS in our organization for flood line studies and hydraulic analysis. The product allows us to determine critical flood levels and the extent of the flood lines and how it affects certain developments and/or bridge and culvert structures or how a proposed development will affect surrounding areas and the natural watercourse. We are able to hydraulically size bridges/culverts accordingly.
  • Ease of use - functionality
  • Accurate results
  • Considers all types of scenarios and structures etc.
  • When dealing with large files, the interface can be slow at times
  • The interface between all different types of files
  • The results are populated well for ease in reporting to a client
  • Greatly improved timelines for finishing a project as everything can be completed together on GeoHECRAS without having to use other software etc.
  • No negative impact thus far.
  • Makes working on these type of projects easier.
Other software not on the list includes HEC-RAS and SWMM / PCSWMM. Initially, we had to use multiple software before going to HEC-RAS to complete projects. Now we are able to complete the entire project on GeoHECRAS alone with so many different features which enable us to analyze various different scenarios with ease.

Do you think GeoHECRAS delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with GeoHECRAS's feature set?

Yes

Did GeoHECRAS live up to sales and marketing promises?

Yes

Did implementation of GeoHECRAS go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy GeoHECRAS again?

Yes

It is well suited to determining the capacity and flood levels for existing structures and sizing proposed structures based on the existing flood levels. In cases where we do not have sufficient information for proposed developments that need to be included in terrain for modeling, it can be challenging to modify the terrain, however, I think this would be the case for most software.