Turning your words into insights is easier with Google speech to text
Overall Satisfaction with Google Cloud Speech-to-Text
Previously, converting the speech to text seemed very time-consuming. The team often needed quick access to the information from the calls, and this real-time transcription enables faster decision-making and keeps the process smoother. Certain times it's very hard and difficult to analyze the large volume of the data. Once the audio is converted into text, we can easily search for any keyword and perform data analysis, as a result of which it will help in improving the report. We as a technical support team use this tool daily to convert the customer conversations into text for quality checking purpose and sentimental analysis We also use this tool for transforming the audio of our field offers into text.
Pros
- Provides high-speed real time streaming transcription like live captioning, automatic note capturing during the the meeting etc
- It supports more than 120 languages, which keeps this product globally recognized. Well, it helps in multilingual call centers that majorly relayed on Google speech-to-text.
- The transcription is formatted very clearly with proper punctuation, commas, and question marks; therefore, no human intervention is needed for correcting the data
Cons
- Real-time transcription needed high-quality audio
- Cost is high for the large-scale operations
- Integration seems to be complex; for certain vocabulary, there is no special GUI for the nontechnical users to make any corrections
- Great accuracy and consistency, where Google Speech to Text provides more consistent results and fewer errors with common accents.
- Significant reduction in the manual transcription as a result of which lower labour cost and faster processing time which improves efficiency and reduces delay in the downstream applications
- There is a scope of accuracy drop in very noisy and overlapping speech environments; as a result, transcription accuracy decreases, requiring manual correction
- Unless usage is optimised or reduced, ongoing costs for higher volume data and usage will be considered high
processing large volumes of audio quickly supports time-sensitive decision-making. Easier integration into application like google cloud services and also it has an ability to support more than 125 languages and accents. The amount of the manual correction has been completely decreased, and overall quality of the data has been improved. By automated transcription it saves time reduces operational costs
Google low latency streaming api seems to be working best when compared to other cloud-supporting tools as this will help in realtime transcription for customer interactions. while comparing azure and amazon the google support more than 125 languages and ascents as we work with multilingual teams and customers so broad language coverage and reliable ascent handling seems to be very essential
Do you think Google Cloud Speech-to-Text delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Google Cloud Speech-to-Text's feature set?
Yes
Did Google Cloud Speech-to-Text live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Google Cloud Speech-to-Text go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Google Cloud Speech-to-Text again?
Yes


Comments
Please log in to join the conversation