Totally Worthy Tool
October 18, 2021

Totally Worthy Tool

Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Software Version

GraalVM Enterprise

Overall Satisfaction with GraalVM

This is among the most robust and user-friendly applications that are being used in certain departments of our company. This is being used to streamline the JAVA codes and test them as well. This has seamless integration with our existing applications which makes the usage very efficient. Also, the cost of deployment is comparatively less resulting in cost savings.
  • This supports Java 11 which results in better performance.
  • Most of the programming languages are supported in this like Java, R, Javascript.
  • The memory utilization is fairly very low.
  • Customer service is bit on the back side and improvement is needed.
  • Manual efforts are needed to make certain libraries work.
  • Micro services are not properly supported.
  • Memory issues has been fairly reduced.
  • The processes has overall become more efficient.
  • Resulted in overall cost reduction.
This community is still in the growing phase and resolution of all issues might not be available in the community. Also, there is a cost factor involved if you take enterprise support which is not great as well.

Do you think GraalVM delivers good value for the price?


Are you happy with GraalVM's feature set?


Did GraalVM live up to sales and marketing promises?

I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process

Did implementation of GraalVM go as expected?

I wasn't involved with the implementation phase

Would you buy GraalVM again?


This is very well suited for someone looking for a high-performance environment. This supports a major variety of programming languages which helps to speed up the development time. Also, it helps to troubleshoot and resolve memory issues in addition to reducing the latency to make the process more efficient. This is not suited for the applications working on some programming language that is currently not supported by this.