JAMS - An Enterprising Look at Automation
Overall Satisfaction with JAMS
Our firm utilizes JAMS to automate multiple business critical processes as well as improve QoL on information gathering and supplemental needs within our own team, department, as well as other departments. For example workflows keying on file transfers and kicking off additional steps in the process to ensure end to end automation and data processing within our firms environment. This scales up to multiple business applications for almost 24/7 processing in the background.
Pros
- Provides a lot of power for powershell based processes
- Extensible to multiple common use cases with SQL or other languages
- AD Integration ability provides ease of access and security management
- Ease of installation makes it easy to onboard end users and integrate into JAMS ecosystem
Cons
- Provide more in depth documentation on both common features as well as lesser known or commonly used features. Only see a couple high level pages and it's hard to extend that knowledge into more complex use cases
- Would like to see some more built in searching functions within job definitions to help filter and navigate larger folder hierarchies
- Reliance on more code centric solutions for safe bulk updates can be a bit more difficult to implement on a larger environment
- Provided a large increase in optimization between managing jobs and automating them within a centralized environment, efficiently executing close to 3k jobs daily with minimal downtime
- Added additional resiliency to our operations with the built in clustering functionality
- Reduce costs with managing jams and man hours needed to integrate new users into the environment with the active directory functionality
While VisualCron provided more guardrails and user centric GUI, JAMS had a better resiliency functions with their clustering and service polling and failovers. We tested this and were able to maintain a large library of jobs and data the seamlessly switches between data centers. In addition the open ended nature of some of the job definitions gives us more power to execute more complex workflows or programmatically implement various loops and sequences that wasn't previously possible in VC
Do you think JAMS delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with JAMS's feature set?
Yes
Did JAMS live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of JAMS go as expected?
I wasn't involved with the implementation phase
Would you buy JAMS again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation