Nagios helps you to know your infrastructure health in real time
Overall Satisfaction with Nagios
Nagios is widely used to control the state of checks over the whole infrastructure in headquarters or remote offices. We wanted a product that could be widely used not only in IT but in other teams too like the R&D teams. We were searching for a free tool to harmonize the checks and to have an approach based on service dependencies.
Pros
- Nagios Map integration to have a visual state of WAN checks.
- Checks based on groups that allows inheritance for each new infrastructure component added.
- Simplicity of use and the web interface and installation.
- Stability of product for years.
Cons
- After a certain number of hosts, Nagios tends to reach its limits in term of performance.
- Unlike concurrent tools, Nagios needs to install an agent on each server you monitor, which complexes the way to get vthe first results or the way you maintain agent versions.
- Compared to concurrent tools, configuration can be tricky when you are new to the tool.
- Affordable tool available for free to cover infrastructure supervision scope
- Dynamic alerting to become proactive for user support, before incident management process is fed
- Scalable tools that helps to progressively have a service dependencies approach
We selected Nagios because of economic constraints with a tool completely free, nor to have a stable product that has reached a stable state since years. . We wanted an extensible product based on number of plugins and a product that can grab datas from many infrastructure products on the market.

Comments
Please log in to join the conversation