Senior Perforamnce Test Engineerblead
April 28, 2021

Senior Perforamnce Test Engineerblead

Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with Quality Center (formerly HP Quality Center)

We use QC for various test management activities, also for end-to-end req tracing in an agile world. Another use case is performance center execution and the same is integrated with QC. Application Life Cycle ALM. Integration with CI CD. Requirement gathering also happens for many projects which in turn provide confidence in agile methodologies.
  • Integration
  • Ease of requirement tracing.
  • End to end execution evidences tracking.
  • Ease of use
  • User friendly
  • Integration with load runner, PC and also with Jmeter.
  • Performance
  • Requirement template should be customizable.
  • Traceability good.
  • Defects notice and mgmt
  • Integration is rigid.
Easy reports
Ease of use
Ease of traceability matrix
Executions are so easy with all options of evidences tracking

QA is rigid in some of the features, like reports, dashboards, and doing integration with some other tools like loadrunner, JMeter, and even Jira. A few reports we can not edit which might be because of its own UI friendliness.

Do you think OpenText ALM/Quality Center delivers good value for the price?


Are you happy with OpenText ALM/Quality Center's feature set?


Did OpenText ALM/Quality Center live up to sales and marketing promises?


Did implementation of OpenText ALM/Quality Center go as expected?


Would you buy OpenText ALM/Quality Center again?


Well suited for defects mgmt and traceability matrix. Less suited for, required gathering with agile models, less documentation, and in customizable dashboards.

OpenText ALM/Quality Center Feature Ratings