Item: Siteimprove
Rating: 9
Author: Lainie Strange

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We are using it enterprise in State Government with a majority of departments using it across the organization.
Is it addressing accessibility and quality assurance issues across all public facing websites?

Pros and Cons

Provides detailed information on where accessibility issues are located
It provides great support in explaining what the accessibility error is
Easy export of reports in multiple formats to share with anyone
Can have unlimited users
It weights the accessibility errors so you know which ones to tackle first

Adjust the accessibility score based on what accessibility standards you have decided to follow for your organization

Most Important Features

Accessibility error reports
Broken links report
Misspelling reports
SEO Optimizations reports

Return on Investment

We have had positive results with accessibility improvements across most of the sites since the start of our subscription.

Alternatives Considered

Monsido

Siteimprove is much more feature rich and robust than Monsido.

Key Insights

Do you think Siteimprove delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with Siteimprove's feature set?

Yes

Did Siteimprove live up to sales and marketing promises?

Yes

Did implementation of Siteimprove go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy Siteimprove again?

Yes

Other Software Used

Adobe Dreamweaver, Rakuten Rewards (formerly Ebates), Pluralsight Skills, LinkedIn Learning (Lynda.com)

Likelihood to Recommend

Siteimprove is better suited for public-facing websites versus interactive applications. It can index interactive applications, but if an application needs user input to move around the applications, this is not well suited for that.
We have a wide variety of skill levels using Siteimprove.

Robust and feature rich tool to get a good handle on site accessibility, quality assurance and search engine optimization

Overall Satisfaction with Siteimprove