Performance testing with Tricentis NeoLoad
Updated September 19, 2025
Performance testing with Tricentis NeoLoad

Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Tricentis NeoLoad
Use of Tricentis NeoLoad by our customers, regular validation of the performance of their applications.GUI testing, API testing and continuous testingI test each time a new version is released, reusing the paths already recorded.Tricentis NeoLoad meets the high-load requirements of one of our customers whose applications are used very heavily over short periods.Tricentis NeoLoad can be injected locally, but also externally via the cloud.
Pros
- High load testing
- Coninuous testing
- Rapid updating of user paths
Cons
- Test on gui client
- Import from other tools
- Export to other tools
- ROI on tests that are carried out regularly
- high licensing costs for short campaigns
- Quick updating user path
Tricentis NeoLoad is specifically designed to help organizations implement performance testing across enterprise environments with features that support scale in several ways:
It enables collaboration across teams with shared test assets and environments
Supports both on-premise and cloud-based load generation
Offers continuous testing integration with CI/CD pipelines
Provides test design capabilities that allow for reusable components
Includes analytics and reporting for performance bottleneck identification
It enables collaboration across teams with shared test assets and environments
Supports both on-premise and cloud-based load generation
Offers continuous testing integration with CI/CD pipelines
Provides test design capabilities that allow for reusable components
Includes analytics and reporting for performance bottleneck identification
Low-code or no-code test design interface that reduces the learning curve for new usersReusable components and modules that can be shared between test scenariosAutomatic script correlation and parameterization to reduce manual scripting workIntegrated debugging tools to quickly identify and resolve test problemsAPI testing capabilities that integrate with modern development workflowsAutomatic script maintenance that can adapt to user interface changes.
Not use but for my customer, integration with tosca and qtest
Do you think Tricentis NeoLoad delivers good value for the price?
Not sure
Are you happy with Tricentis NeoLoad's feature set?
Yes
Did Tricentis NeoLoad live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Tricentis NeoLoad go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Tricentis NeoLoad again?
Yes
Using Tricentis NeoLoad
3 - This represents a team that operates as a service centre for performance testing for multiple clients and numerous applications.Their commercial function is to demonstrate their responsiveness in order to continue working with these clients.
3 - These are the same people who use NeoLoad. There is no dedicated support for NeoLoad; users rely on each other and regularly share their experiences.These individuals are certified either at the professional level or at the trainer level.They also have experience with other load testing tools and are ISTQB certified.
- Load tests
- Performance test
- Continuous integration
- Automatic test deployment
- Business continuity test
- No different vision for the future
Evaluating Tricentis NeoLoad and Competitors
Yes - For one customer, NeoLoad replaced LoadRunner.The implementation and licensing costs favoured NeoLoad. This customer has many applications to test. I don't have any further information on what influenced their decision, but it suited us well and allowed us to highlight our previously acquired certifications, and we advised them on the implementation.
- Ease of Use
- Other
The choice of tool was not ours to make; we supported them as a service centre provider. However, the ease with which user journeys can be recorded and configured works in NeoLoad's favour, saving time when performing performance testing services.
The selection process must be based on maintainability, ease of implementation and speed of results.Cost must also be taken into account, but should not be the primary criterion. Time savings must be taken into consideration, as they reduce implementation costs over time.
Tricentis NeoLoad Implementation
Change management was minimal - NeoLoad was already in place for most of our clients when I joined the organisation.
- Kubernetes deployment
Tricentis NeoLoad Support
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
Knowledgeable team No escalation required | Slow Resolution Difficult to get immediate help Slow Initial Response |
Non, car les licences sont achetées par nos clients.
Using Tricentis NeoLoad
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
Like to use Relatively simple Easy to use Technical support not required Well integrated Consistent Quick to learn Convenient Feel confident using | None |
- Varaible Extract
- Framework
- Report
- Graphe
- Lightweight web interface

Comments
Please log in to join the conversation