Windows Server Failover Clustering
January 07, 2025
Windows Server Failover Clustering

Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Windows Server Failover Clustering
I use Windows Server Failover Clustering primarily in hyperv clusters with physical servers but also in some cases in hyperv clusters with virtual servers (nested virtualization in lab environments). Also i use Windows Server Failover Clustering in SQL Server virtual clustering (guest clustering). The major business problems addressed are high availability and agility in hosting business workloads in a reliable manner.
Pros
- HyperV live migration
- HyperV storage migration
- Virtual machine failover
Cons
- Cluster-aware updating seems to not be consistent in all cases
- Hardware supportability matrix can be expanded to cover more hardware
- Some specialized use cases can only be carried out via Powershell only
- Reduced total cost of ownership by 15% after consolidating standalone servers into 1 cluster
- Increased return on investment by 20% after utilizing the new HyperV cluster with virtualized workloads
- Increased productivity and overall infrastructure availability by 30%
Do you think Windows Server Failover Clustering delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Windows Server Failover Clustering's feature set?
Yes
Did Windows Server Failover Clustering live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Windows Server Failover Clustering go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Windows Server Failover Clustering again?
Yes

Comments
Please log in to join the conversation