Likelihood to Recommend
I recommend it to all. IT is a very useful tool that helps to perform tests of all kinds quickly, and obtains reliable results with high accuracy. We all have different needs, but for mine it is perfectly suited. However, it requires clear requirements before using the tool.
Read full review
It's not perfect but it definitely does its job and what its purpose for. The fact that we were able to access this globally and produce a great product after performing massive bera testing gave that "dev" feels eventhough we aren't. Seeing the cross comment add collaboration made it more intuitive because we were able to narrow down on the specifics of what we were actually testing
Read full review Pros It is very easy to use and adapt, allowing the QA to do the tests faster and detect errors in a timely manner. It has helped us decrease development time on new applications, since we used to spend a lot time solving errors after the launch of the application. It has helped us a lot in our testing processes, since the tool contains exploratory tests with which critical errors can be detected in an efficient and fast way. In turn, we have good follow-up on our products, thanks to the fact that the tool allows us to document the commercial flows more critically and automate them. Read full review One stop destination for managing all aspects of testing, including community, recruiting, feedback (bugs, suggestions, surveys). Easy way to communicate with testers and collect their feedback Customizability, I can customize the platform to address differences between products. Read full review Cons The quality of the testers should be better, so that all of them produce useful, excellent results, and not just some of them. The product could be improved with a more friendly interface and more tutorials to allow new users who do not have any kind of experience to easily adapt. It could also improve customer service. Read full review Tag and attribute searching for forms, messages, and surveys Report graphics with large datasets More of a focus on B2B beta testing and not solely business to customer Read full review Likelihood to Renew
Makes beta enjoyable.
Read full review Support Rating
Tony is amazing. I look forward to our interactions.
Read full review Alternatives Considered
I find 99test more useful, since it has a phone support feature that many other applications do not have, and also allows testing in Windows Phone app. Overall, it is very useful for small businesses. Also, it's price is very low, which makes it a very competitive application because it delivers equally reliable and useful results quickly, for less cost.
Read full review
Centercode is better than Google Forms and Sheets for our use case of a long ongoing beta with participants rotating in and out 10000x times better. However, it might be a little too complex for what we needed. We may have been better off with something in the middle--a little more lightweight and cheaper.
Read full review Return on Investment Excellent impact since it allows precise tests before launching the applications, thus preventing capital losses. It helped us to carry a complete documentation of the tests thus reducing times. It reduced the problems that the developers of the organization had because the tests make sure that the new functions work excellently and the old functions do not get corrupted. Read full review A project and beta testing that could've taken > 6 months or even years was cut down to a month and few weeks only Overall accessibility, ease of use, and security were right on the money Collaboration tools and features allowing everyone to innovate and spark great ideas and share it Read full review ScreenShots