GIMP vs OctaneRender

• GIMP has all the tools that Photoshop has which allows us to be as creative as we want.
• GIMP has continual upgrades that fix bugs and add new features.
• GIMP has a great user community.

Read full review

• Octane uses GPU rendering so it takes advantage of the video card.
• It gives you a good selection of options to tweak and refine your model rendering.
• It can use 3D instances so it doesn't overuse computer resources.
• There are plugins that can be incorporated into other 3D packages for rendering.
• Octane is particularly inexpensive compared to other 3D render packages.
• You are able to copy certain sections of nodes in order to create different iterations of the same environment or model. For example, changing the lighting or camera features.

Read full review

• GIMP can sometimes take awhile to load, especially when downloading new font types.
• Some of the complex features need a workaround method that requires copying or adjusting a layer before being able to make the desired changes. This can make some projects take a fair amount of time.

Read full review

• Its user interface could use some improvement.
• It is node-based so there is a slight learning curve when using it as a beginner.
• It doesn't import FBX files.
• It requires a 3D model to have UVs in order to import it into Octane.
• At times it may not be as stable.

Read full review

• GIMP has allowed me to present clients with high-quality and creative logos that meet every requirement.
• GIMP has allowed me to maintain brand consistency across a large variety of projects.

Read full review

• Octane has had a huge advantage of GPU rendering.
• It's relatively inexpensive compared to other rendering packages.
• It allows for more control over the scene compared to packages like Keyshot.

Read full review