A/P One vs. Esker
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
A/P One | Score1 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | CoreIntegrator, KODAK, and Fujitsu join forces to create the ultimate AP Automation Solution – A/P One Traditional AP automation solutions can take months to design and implement and can cost well into the hundreds of thousands of dollars. A/P One from Kodak and CoreIntegrator is designed to help users get up and running in only a few days, and only pay for the invoices that users process, no matter the number of users and approvers. Invoices… | N/A |
Esker | Score7.4 out of 10 | N/A | Esker is a global cloud platform built to unlock strategic value for finance and customer service professionals and strengthen collaboration between companies by automating the cash conversion cycle. Esker’s mission is to build a foundation that promotes positive-sum growth, increased productivity, improved employee engagement, and greater trust between organizations. | N/A |
| A/P One | Esker | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | With A/P, you pay for what you process: $1.50/invoice with Kodak Scan Cloud and Smart A/P – and $1.25 without Kodak Scan Cloud and Smart A/P. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| A/P One | Esker | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Would buy again 12 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 9 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 12 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 5 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 78% Implementation went as expected 7 Answers | |
| A/P One | Esker | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | BILL Score8.2 out of 10 | M‑Files Score8.9 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Stampli Score8.4 out of 10 | Square 9 Softworks Score9.3 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Yooz Score8.8 out of 10 | Tungsten Capture Score9.4 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| A/P One | Esker | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - | 10.0 |
| Usability | - | 5.5 |
| Support Rating | - | 8.9 |
| A/P One | Esker | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | No answers on this topic |
|
| Pros | No answers on this topic |
|
| Cons | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment | No answers on this topic |
|
| ScreenShots | A/P One Screenshots |



