Accenture People + Work Connect vs. Monster.com

Accenture People + Work Connect is a wonderful platform, no doubt, and is suitable when you are looking out for talent and hiring for open roles in the organizations and in specific regions. Accenture People + Work Connect helped us in identifying the right talent for the position in the region required. However, when compared to the other platforms for hiring there is a lot more that needs to be developed and updated.

Incentivized

It is very well for the IT recruitment. Database of the C2C is candidate is very large and very helpful. Monster.com timely do the updates so less bugs and less issues compared to other portals. Using different to get the best potential candidate is very good while using Monster Job Portal.

Incentivized

• Easy application process.
• Faster and effective tracking.
• Flexibility in search.

Incentivized

• Monster makes it easy for us to post jobs on their platform.
• Working with Monster does an excellent job of providing alerts when applicants submit for open positions.
• Our applications that we get from Monster applicants are easy for us to segment out for faster sorting and selections.

Incentivized

• UI could be a bit more clean.
• Filter search at times doesn't display all the relevant positions.
• Advanced Filter option for more details search could be helpful.

Incentivized

• Monster.com can improve on its data redundancy aspect. It frustrates the users to look at or access the same sets of results or the same applications again and again.
• It can also look into the spam feature. There are ways one can spam it by taking out information.

Incentivized

Monster is a job portal with rich features and a great depth of database in candidates. They also have a good search option that is able to display the right candidates when you search for them. The only gripe that I have about Monster is that they need to improve their database of candidates when it comes to blue-collar jobs or non-software jobs.

Incentivized

From my discussion with the management with regards to hiring and the portal used, I came to know that Google for Jobs was able to be considered earlier, but was rejected as there was lots of noise, multiple unwanted applications and the filtering process also took a while and wasted the time of the TA team.

Incentivized

I think Monster.com fills a different niche. SeekOut/LinkedIn are more about finding candidates from the overall pool of millions of profiles and resumes. Monster.com shows you immediately who is looking, who is applying, etc. Monster.com also has the salary tools, which I think is very unique. The other sites do not have that and aren't as transparent about the market. Which I think is very valuable during competitive hiring times like these.

Incentivized

• Helped in faster application filtering.
• Got the right candidates applications.
• Gave overall picture of availability from the application pool.

Incentivized

• Using Monster.com gives us a sense of confidence in a time-tested platform.
• We know that using Monster.com will be a better use of our time and resources.
• By knowing we are working with a jobs posting partner like Monster.com we know that we will get to the positive, timely, qualified applicants we're looking for.
• Time is money and Monster.com helps us save a lot of both.

Incentivized