Adaface vs. Harver

Anytime before in-person interview. Don't waste time doing anything else. Better to go with data. My suggestion would be to send candidates from resume screening stage or phone call stage to Adaface test stage. Candidates who pass are automatically flagged by Adaface. Those candidates take them to interviews. You will save a ton of time this way

Harver is a unique and efficient talent matching platform, this platform helps HR departments to easily identify the best talent for our open positions. Harver is easy to use and set up, has a solid user interface, with great integrations (quite limited, but good), plus it provides a pleasant experience for job seekers, making it easy for them to find the right job.

Incentivized

• Addressing challenges in the recruitment process
• Technical assessments on coding and other technical languages with ease
• Streamlining the process of assessing candidates' skills

Incentivized

• They provide accurate candidate data.
• Facilitates hiring decisions.
• I can conduct video interviews.
• Integrates with the following applications: Connexys Recruiting Software, Jobvite, SmartRecruiters, TalentSoft, etc.

Incentivized

• Pricing (they are costlier than others)
• Assignments
• SAP tests (they said this is in the works)

• Customer Service initially was poor, but we now have a good account manager. However, compared to Checkster, (outmatch acquired) there is a clear service level difference.

Incentivized

It's super simple to use. Cleanest interface I have seen. UX is straightforward. They do have help center in case you are stuck but I didn't need it (Used it to know about ATS integrations once). Support team is helpful. Strong positive feedback from our hiring managers for their test reports.

I've been with the company for 6 years and we have always used OutMatch so I don't really have anything to compare to

Incentivized

• Has simplified our hiring process significantly, making for less expenditure during onboarding and interviewing

Incentivized

• Better quality of hire, reducing is less turnover during probation.
• Reduction in cost of hire.
• Reduction in time to hire.

Incentivized