Adlumin is a security operations command center that simplifies complexity and keeps organizations of all sizes secure. Its technology and integrations create a platform that obtains security telemetry from across an organization to provide greater insights into security alerts and streamline workflows.
N/A
Watchguard Endpoint Security
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
WatchGuard EPDR (formerly Panda Adaptive Defense 360) combines next-generation antivirus protection, endpoint detection and response (EDR), patch management, content filtering, email security, full disk encryption, and more, into one package. The platform touts a unique zero-trust security service that certifies the legitimacy and safety of all running applications thanks to a combination of automated, AI-driven processes and investigation services provided by a team of malware analysts.
I don't remember the names of the other companies we looked into for this type of service, but Adlumin being tied to our RMM / EDR / backup vendor made it a much easier buy-in. We didn't need to go through the vendor management process, and the price tag gets lowered through …
I do not have another MDR solution to reference, as this is the company's first MDR product. However, I have worked with plenty of security solutions and vendors and have not gotten as much issue/noise as I have with this product. I believe with a lot of work, it can be a …
We are currently testing the Neighborhood Watch licenses provided through the MSP program on a limited set of devices, so it is still too early to fully assess how it performs or compares at scale.
Given how tightly knit things are with nAble and the proven consolidated pricing, it was only obvious that we keep everything with 1 company rather than separately.
ArcticWolf has been a great product that we have used, but the ability that Adlumin has is extremely comparable for a fraction of the price. There are no hardware requirements with Adlumin, but it still has all of the abilities as ArcticWolf without the overheard. Again, the …
We toured Barracuda's MDR services before going with Adlumin, an N-able company, as we utilize Barracuda for email security. Overall, we prefered Adlumin due to its easier integration with N-Central and price point.
S1 vigilance was being offboarded as I came on. From my understanding the false positive rates were a lot, and getting ahold of someone was very hard to do. We are likely not to go back, but are currently looking at Huntress, huntress is cheaper and has a good reputation, we'll …
The price was the main point. Most of the companies above have great products, but they are way overpriced for my company. N-able/Adlumin just made more sense to have everything needed in one place.
Huntress seems to provide better human support, less onerous long-term lock-ins. The portal is friendlier in Huntress. The setup is easier. Time will tell if the security is as good but from all reports Huntress seems to be quite effective.
We didn't spend much time looking into Symantec - but it was the software of choice for the district before I joined. That said, we were pretty easily talked into Watchguard Endpoint Security as we were already in the Watchguard world of products. Moving to their EDR just …
The Watchguard Endpoint Security solution is more cost effect then the ESET endpoint solution. We already had a number of WatchGuard solutions so it made sense to easily add another.
We prefer to maintain loyalty with a brand that really delivers what it promises. Our focus is to bring customers who have other solutions to Watchguard's base, however some companies have their own IT department and already work with other tools.
The WithSecure EPDR only covers part of the security needs.Using WatchGuard Endpoint Security covers the same needs, but with close integration with other security solutions used, such as the WatchGuard firewall.
WatchGuard is hands-down better than the competition, on price and value as well its amazing ROI. It scales easily and deals with the most complex security needs one could have. All the while having a UI which is seamless, ensuring that my team don't have to hunt through nested …
Way back in the day, I have used Norton end point security and really did not like the speed at which it tried to do its job. I know I am dating myself here. WatchGuard Endpoint Security, I feel, is light years ahead of Norton's product. WatchGuard Endpoint Security is FAST, …
The main reason we have selected WatchGuard Endpoint Security is the integration it has with the other WatchGuard security products we are using. The WatchGuard Cloud platform is really of great value!
We upgraded from Webroot to WatchGuard EPP as we felt it offered greater protection for end points. The basic reports are emailed to us each month that we run through with our clients each month to review the current environment and any security patterns we can see through the …
I think every products has their own pro and con. When I worked for another company they used Cisco and later they migrate them to Palo Alto. I would say every company has their own standard hardware as well as the budgets we need to be considering. WatchGuard is the best one …
The Cloud Console of WatchGuard is more user friendly. The impact of the agent on the computers and servers are less. The no trust behavior of the agent is very interesting and efficient.
WatchGuard Endpoint Security has native XDR, has 4 security pillars on a single platform, has the ability to correlate information from solutions together, and offers greater protection to critical environments.
WatchGuard Endpoint Security possui um XDR nativo, possui 4 pilares …
Watchguard is by far a tool that all organizations should be able to count on, I have had experiences with other protection tools, and none of them has responded effectively to the challenges posed by the increasingly lethal attacks of malicious people, who only intend to …
Despite offering great value for money, comparing Sophos' offering to WatchGuard Endpoint Security we find Sophos' offering is far superiour due to it's support system, the distributors it uses (apart from Arrow), it's management console, the resource-light application and, …
Based on our experience, Adlumin is well-suited for high‑confidence, true‑positive security events that require rapid detection and response. When the signal is clear, especially around confirmed malicious behavior, the platform works well and adds real value through automation and SOC engagement. Adlumin has been less effective with heavy use of legitimate administrative tools such as RMM, vulnerability scanners, and scripted activity. In these scenarios, we have seen repeated false positives, hasty server isolations, and actions taken without adequate human validation, leading to operational disruption and increased alert fatigue.
I can only speak to WatchGuard Endpoint Security being well suited for us. Because we have over 350 devices (tablet, laptops, desktops, phones) on our network, this product has been a great fit, especially when paired wih our Firebox m390. Again, the protection is fast, low overhead, and virtually undetectable that it is running all the time.
Watchguard has a simple to understand GUI and installation process. It has integrated itself into our IT environment and is important to our day to day operations and security posture. It is easy to scale with the growth of the business. As a modern company needs a strong EPDR watchguard is a very good choice.
A number of integrations were simple to set up and well documented, but a few things were difficult or undocumented yet. Some sections feel over-complicated and others feel way too vague during the setup process. Once the onboarding is finished though, the product is very simple, but there is a learning curve at the beginning.
Easy and intuitive MSP management portal to manage all of your clients from a single pane of glass. Policies can be pushed down globally or individually based on needs. The client portal allows access to their tenant information and installs only which is nice if you are working with clients who might have an internal person or an IT team that also wants access to things to manage themself.
The software is 100% managed on a cloud platform that can be managed via an account even if they are not present within the company network where the software is installed, I even always opened the control panel on the browser of my smartphone to monitor the situation.I have never experienced any abnormal software crashes
The only annoyance I complain, if we want to be picky, is the fact of the constant disconnections from the control panel.Every about 4 hours the account logs out even if I set the "remember this device" flag; having said that I have not noticed neither slowdowns nor conflicts with other software
I gave it a 10 because I compare it to air conditioning. I need it to work every day, 24/7. I need it to be reliable and not something that requires a ton of interaction from staff to make sure it works every day. In addition, I should be able to run other things at my house when the AC is on. Panda fits that description.
The training was very helpful. It demonstrated how to configure the service for initial install, items to monitor, and how to set up for ongoing protection. Hands on training is more helpful but this is a good starting point
Implementation shouldn't present any problems in standard office environments. In environments with development teams, however, caution is needed. If zero trust is enabled, mechanisms must be in place to ensure that internal software isn't classified as a false positive (software certificate, exception folder, etc.)
I don't remember the names of the other companies we looked into for this type of service, but Adlumin being tied to our RMM / EDR / backup vendor made it a much easier buy-in. We didn't need to go through the vendor management process, and the price tag gets lowered through multiple-service discounts :-D
We didn't spend much time looking into Symantec - but it was the software of choice for the district before I joined. That said, we were pretty easily talked into Watchguard Endpoint Security as we were already in the Watchguard world of products. Moving to their EDR just seemed to make sense for our organization
With the implementation of watchguard (at the beginning Panda Endpoint, but it is the same) I was able to insert in the control panel all the unauthorized software previously installed by colleagues without any authorization from the various department heads.Now any licensed software goes into lockdown and can be unlocked from the control panel
We used to be with an MSP before I was hired, and the company spent over 20K per year for that service. With N-Able, we have reduced the cost by over half.
I spend minimal time now patching computers because this is all automated. I sometimes have to patch a couple of machines because I missed a patch, but it has saved me a great deal of time.
I save a great deal of time with Board Reports because they are automatically generated for me each month.
By committing to go all in on Watchguard Advanced EPDR across our whole client base, we maximized our price position - enabling us to offer the best endpoint security at a price better than what lesser competitive products cost.
Leveraging Watchguard Endpoint Security as part of our unified platform strategy provides better integrated security, managed through Watchguard's cloud architecture. This significantly reduces our cost to deploy, manage, and support our client's. Our improved security offering, better delivery, and stronger price position has helped us achieve 56% growth in our managed services business over the past 18-months.
Organizations that have disparate cyber security products often require specialists for each solution in their stack. Watchguard provides outstanding training resources that equip our entire technical staff - significantly improving our service delivery while lowering our overall cost of business.