Ironclad, from the company of the same name in San Francisco, is designed to streamline every part of the contract process—so users can focus on legal work, not paperwork.
N/A
Pricing
AIR CRE Contracts
Ironclad
Editions & Modules
Basic
$600
one-time fee
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AIR CRE Contracts
Ironclad
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AIR CRE Contracts
Ironclad
Features
AIR CRE Contracts
Ironclad
Contract Authoring
Comparison of Contract Authoring features of Product A and Product B
AIR CRE Contracts
7.5
1 Ratings
7% below category average
Ironclad
6.4
5 Ratings
23% below category average
Contract creation
8.01 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Contract templates
8.01 Ratings
9.45 Ratings
Clause library/saved fields
7.01 Ratings
3.24 Ratings
Guided logic
7.01 Ratings
3.83 Ratings
Contract Collaboration
Comparison of Contract Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
AIR CRE Contracts
5.0
1 Ratings
48% below category average
Ironclad
7.8
5 Ratings
4% below category average
Contract editing
5.01 Ratings
7.25 Ratings
Contract sharing
00 Ratings
8.35 Ratings
Collaborating on contracts
00 Ratings
8.35 Ratings
MS Word plug-in
00 Ratings
7.24 Ratings
Approval process
00 Ratings
7.85 Ratings
Interdepartmental workflows
00 Ratings
7.85 Ratings
Contract Monitoring
Comparison of Contract Monitoring features of Product A and Product B
AIR CRE Contracts
8.0
1 Ratings
3% below category average
Ironclad
5.1
5 Ratings
47% below category average
Contract search
10.01 Ratings
7.05 Ratings
Contract database
00 Ratings
6.04 Ratings
Contract milestone reminders & alerts
00 Ratings
2.74 Ratings
Custom contract reports
00 Ratings
5.04 Ratings
Tracking contract status
00 Ratings
4.44 Ratings
Compliance check
00 Ratings
3.23 Ratings
Contract Management
Comparison of Contract Management features of Product A and Product B
Personally, I feel AIR CRE Contracts are great for NNN leases. They get the point across and offer the language we need without much addition or revision. The lease offers extensive language that helps with future potential disputes and covers questions that may occur from the tenants end well. Example, who maintains what or who is responsible for certain items.
I think it worked realllly well at my previous company where we used it for a very simple form that just required one simple signature from both sides- this was a form used to record custom pricing/discounts for a product that typically was not discounted. In my current role, there are many more required fields on the form/contract, and can be multiple levels of approvals on one side, and then possibly multiple levels of approvals/signatures on the other side. I've never used another solution in the exact same way (like DocuSign) to be able to compare experiences, but on Ironclad, understanding where I am in the completion process can be confusing. Within the app, I wish it was more of just a checklist or schedule of what needs to happen, but it's not written out that clearly. Lastly, there is something wrong with our notifications (I'm not sure if this is specific to my company's settings)- I frequently get 'contract completed' or 'contract signed' email notifications even if that hasn't occurred. They seem to correlate with updating the form or refreshing the sync from SFDC.
I think I would rate AIR CRE Contracts has a pretty good usability rating. It is easy to use and simple to utilize, whether it comes down to leases, agency agreements, purchasing agreements, estoppels, or even just purchasing credits to create more agreements. I like that it is fillable, editable, and easy to find certain items when needed.
Ironclad is the best tool I have used to date, to manage workflow and tickets. It was very easy to use and navigate from the very first time I used it. My time is very valuable and I don't have time to sit in training sessions, simply to use a new product. I'm happy to say that I was never formally trained on Ironclad as it simply wasn't necessary.
I believe I called in for AIR CRE Contracts support one time in the past. The program was not working and it turned out we needed to have both AIR CRE Contracts support and our Information technology (IT) department both work on it to get it working. While I did not fully interact with them, they were able to fix the issues with our IT department relatively smoothly
I haven't used the support services for IronClad, but I understand from our legal team, the support is very good, they have replied and provide solutions quickly and effectively. I have used the documentation and support pages which are very complete and which have been updated given the user interface updates.
I think AIR CRE Contracts offers more of what we need for commerical real estate than Legal Templates. I feel there was more language qith the AIR CRE Contracts that protect the landlord and offer support, where as Legal Templates offered a broader scope of legal language. Obviously, having an attorney draft a specific lease template for a building is the best way to go but if you need something that can fit more types of leases/buildings AIR CRE Contracts seems to work the best for us.
At Gusto, where we operated on no contracts for many years, Ironclad allowed us to create a very simple process for getting approval for, and keeping records of, customized pricing on our new, high-end plan.
Wasn't part of the buying committee, but in my current role it's been heavily utilized externally for customer contracts, but also internally for employee agreements.
I don't have any actual numbers, and don't have a way to compare it to any prior e-signature setup.