Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) vs. DigitalOcean
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) | Score7.5 out of 10 | N/A | The Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) provides a simple, scalable, elastic file system for Linux-based workloads for use with AWS Cloud services and on-premises resources. | $0.04 per GB |
DigitalOcean | Score8.5 out of 10 | N/A | DigitalOcean is an infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS) platform from the company of the same name headquartered in New York. It is known for its support of managed Kubernetes clusters and “droplets” feature. | $5 Starting Price Per Month |
| Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) | DigitalOcean | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | There is no minimum fee or setup charge. You pay only for the storage you use, for read and write access to data stored in Infrequent Access storage classes, and for any provisioned throughput. Amazon EFS offers four storage classes: two standard storage classes, including Amazon EFS Standard and Amazon EFS Standard-Infrequent Access (EFS Standard-IA), and two One Zone storage classes, including Amazon EFS One Zone and Amazon EFS One Zone-Infrequent Access | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) | DigitalOcean | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 5 Answers | 100% Would buy again 11 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 11 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 5 Answers | 100% Happy with the feature set 11 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 11 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 11 Answers | |
| Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) | DigitalOcean | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) | DigitalOcean | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | IBM Cloud Object Storage Score9 out of 10 | IBM Cloud Object Storage Score9 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers Score8.7 out of 10 | IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers Score8.7 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | SAP on IBM Cloud Score9 out of 10 | SAP on IBM Cloud Score9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) | DigitalOcean | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 9.0 |
| Usability | - | 8.9 |
| Availability | - | 10.0 |
| Performance | - | 9.0 |
| Support Rating | 8.0 | 8.8 |
| Product Scalability | - | 10.0 |
| Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) | DigitalOcean | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Reliability and Availability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Performance | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Scalability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots |








