Anaconda vs. IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Anaconda
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Anaconda provides access to the foundational open-source Python and R packages used in modern AI, data science, and machine learning. These enterprise-grade solutions enable corporate, research, and academic institutions around the world to harness open-source for competitive advantage and research. Anaconda also provides enterprise-grade security to open-source software through the Premium Repository.
$0
per month
IBM Watson Studio
Score 9.9 out of 10
N/A
IBM Watson Studio enables users to build, run and manage AI models, and optimize decisions at scale across any cloud. IBM Watson Studio enables users can operationalize AI anywhere as part of IBM Cloud Pak® for Data, the IBM data and AI platform. The vendor states the solution simplifies AI lifecycle management and accelerates time to value with an open, flexible multicloud architecture.N/A
Pricing
AnacondaIBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
Editions & Modules
Free Tier
$0
per month
Starter Tier
$9
per month
Business Tier
$50
per month per user
Enterprise Tier
60.00+
per month per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AnacondaIBM Watson Studio
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AnacondaIBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
Considered Both Products
Anaconda

No answer on this topic

IBM Watson Studio
Chose IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
The mix of proprietary and open-source benefits that DSx offers gives me more flexibility than any other options I have encountered. I have the custom program building capability of Anaconda with the built-in predictive models of SPSS Modeler. I have more visualization …
Chose IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
SPSS - Totally different approaches, SPSS UI is now a well-known name with a well-established user base who we consider aren´t going anywhere but Statistics.

Modeler - A proven analytical solution with capabilities to deal with huge datasets, scalability offers you now the …
Chose IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
DSx stands out in that deployment can be done easily through Watson ML whereas for other technologies separate paradigms are needed.
Chose IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
Elastic Search is based only on json format, while with IBM DSX I have no restrictions on this. One main limitation however appears in DSX when there are issues in importing different types of datasets in the notebook. In particular, the json importing fails somehow with nested …
Chose IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
I selected IBM Data Science Experience (DSx) because it promotes collaboration. That being said, it could be a bit challenging to prevent people who use it for the first time, because the interface could seem a bit complex for some - said by people I worked with. Therefore, it …
Features
AnacondaIBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
Platform Connectivity
Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of Product A and Product B
Anaconda
9.3
25 Ratings
11% above category average
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
8.1
22 Ratings
3% below category average
Connect to Multiple Data Sources9.822 Ratings8.022 Ratings
Extend Existing Data Sources8.024 Ratings8.022 Ratings
Automatic Data Format Detection9.721 Ratings10.021 Ratings
MDM Integration9.614 Ratings6.414 Ratings
Data Exploration
Comparison of Data Exploration features of Product A and Product B
Anaconda
8.5
25 Ratings
1% above category average
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
10.0
22 Ratings
18% above category average
Visualization9.025 Ratings10.022 Ratings
Interactive Data Analysis8.024 Ratings10.022 Ratings
Data Preparation
Comparison of Data Preparation features of Product A and Product B
Anaconda
9.0
26 Ratings
10% above category average
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
9.5
22 Ratings
16% above category average
Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment8.823 Ratings10.022 Ratings
Data Transformations8.026 Ratings10.021 Ratings
Data Encryption9.719 Ratings8.020 Ratings
Built-in Processors9.620 Ratings10.021 Ratings
Platform Data Modeling
Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
Anaconda
9.2
24 Ratings
9% above category average
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
9.5
22 Ratings
12% above category average
Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools9.023 Ratings10.021 Ratings
Automated Machine Learning8.921 Ratings10.022 Ratings
Single platform for multiple model development10.024 Ratings10.022 Ratings
Self-Service Model Delivery9.019 Ratings8.020 Ratings
Model Deployment
Comparison of Model Deployment features of Product A and Product B
Anaconda
9.5
21 Ratings
11% above category average
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
8.0
22 Ratings
6% below category average
Flexible Model Publishing Options10.021 Ratings9.022 Ratings
Security, Governance, and Cost Controls9.020 Ratings7.022 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AnacondaIBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
Small Businesses
Jupyter Notebook
Jupyter Notebook
Score 8.6 out of 10
Jupyter Notebook
Jupyter Notebook
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AnacondaIBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(38 ratings)
8.0
(65 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.0
(1 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(3 ratings)
9.6
(2 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
8.9
(9 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
AnacondaIBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
Likelihood to Recommend
Anaconda
I have asked all my juniors to work with Anaconda and Pycharm only, as this is the best combination for now. Coming to use cases: 1. When you have multiple applications using multiple Python variants, it is a really good tool instead of Venv (I never like it). 2. If you have to work on multiple tools and you are someone who needs to work on data analytics, development, and machine learning, this is good. 3. If you have to work with both R and Python, then also this is a good tool, and it provides support for both.
Read full review
IBM
It has a lot of features that are good for teams working on large-scale projects and continuously developing and reiterating their data project models. Really helpful when dealing with large data. It is a kind of one-stop solution for all data science tasks like visualization, cleaning, analyzing data, and developing models but small teams might find a lot of features unuseful.
Read full review
Pros
Anaconda
  • Anaconda is a one-stop destination for important data science and programming tools such as Jupyter, Spider, R etc.
  • Anaconda command prompt gave flexibility to use and install multiple libraries in Python easily.
  • Jupyter Notebook, a famous Anaconda product is still one of the best and easy to use product for students like me out there who want to practice coding without spending too much money.
Read full review
IBM
  • Integration of IBM Watson APIs such as speech to text, image recognition, personality insights, etc.
  • SPSS modeler and neural network model provide no-code environments for data scientists to build pipelines quickly.
  • Enforced best-practices set up POCs for deployment in production with a minimum of re-work.
  • Estimator validation lets data scientists test and prove different models.
Read full review
Cons
Anaconda
  • It can have a cloud interface to store the work.
  • Compatible for large size files.
  • I used R Studio for building Machine Learning models, Many times when I tried to run the entire code together the software would crash. It would lead to loss of data and changes I made.
Read full review
IBM
  • The cost is steep and so only companies with resources can afford it
  • It will be nice to have Chinese versions so that Chinese engineers can also use it easily
  • It takes a while to learn how to input different kinds of skin defects for detection
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Anaconda
It's really good at data processing, but needs to grow more in publishing in a way that a non-programmer can interact with. It also introduces confusion for programmers that are familiar with normal Python processes which are slightly different in Anaconda such as virtualenvs.
Read full review
IBM
because we find out that DSX results have improved our approach to the whole subject (data, models, procedures)
Read full review
Usability
Anaconda
I am giving this rating because I have been using this tool since 2017, and I was in college at that time. Initially, I hesitated to use it as I was not very aware of the workings of Python and how difficult it is to manage its dependency from project to project. Anaconda really helped me with that. The first machine-learning model that I deployed on the Live server was with Anaconda only. It was so managed that I only installed libraries from the requirement.txt file, and it started working. There was no need to manually install cuda or tensor flow as it was a very difficult job at that time. Graphical data modeling also provides tools for it, and they can be easily saved to the system and used anywhere.
Read full review
IBM
The UI flawlessly merges this offering by providing a neat, minimal, responsive interface
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Anaconda
No answers on this topic
IBM
From time to time there are services unavailable, but we have been always informed before and they got back to work sooner than expected
Read full review
Performance
Anaconda
No answers on this topic
IBM
Never had slow response even on our very busy network
Read full review
Support Rating
Anaconda
Anaconda provides fast support, and a large number of users moderate its online community. This enables any questions you may have to be answered in a timely fashion, regardless of the topic. The fact that it is based in a Python environment only adds to the size of the online community.
Read full review
IBM
I received answers mostly at once and got answered even further my question: they gave me interesting points of view and suggestion for deepening in the learning path
Read full review
In-Person Training
Anaconda
No answers on this topic
IBM
The trainers on the job are very smart with solutions and very able in teaching
Read full review
Online Training
Anaconda
No answers on this topic
IBM
The Platform is very handy and suggests further steps according my previous interests
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Anaconda
No answers on this topic
IBM
It surprised us with unpredictable case of use and brand new points of view
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Anaconda
I have experience using RStudio oustide of Anaconda. RStudio can be installed via anaconda, but I like to use RStudio separate from Anaconda when I am worin in R. I tend to use Anaconda for python and RStudio for working in R. Although installing libraries and packages can sometimes be tricky with both RStudio and Anaconda, I like installing R packages via RStudio. However, for anything python-related, Anaconda is my go to!
Read full review
IBM
The main reason I personally changed over from Azure ML Studio is because it lacked any support for significant custom modelling with packages and services such as TensorFlow, scikit-learn, Microsoft Cognitive Toolkit and Spark ML. IBM Watson Studio provides these services and does so in a well integrated and easy to use fashion making it a preferable service over the other services that I have personally used.
Read full review
Scalability
Anaconda
No answers on this topic
IBM
It helped us in getting from 0 to DSX without getting lost
Read full review
Return on Investment
Anaconda
  • It has helped our organization to work collectively faster by using Anaconda's collaborative capabilities and adding other collaboration tools over.
  • By having an easy access and immediate use of libraries, developing times has decreased more than 20 %
  • There's an enormous data scientist shortage. Since Anaconda is very easy to use, we have to be able to convert several professionals into the data scientist. This is especially true for an economist, and this my case. I convert myself to Data Scientist thanks to my econometrics knowledge applied with Anaconda.
Read full review
IBM
  • Could instantly show data driven insights to drive 20% incremental revenue over existing results
  • Still don't have a real use case for unstructured data like twitter feed
  • Some of the insights around user actions have driven new projects to automate mundane tasks
Read full review
ScreenShots