Anaconda vs. IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Anaconda
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Anaconda provides access to the foundational open-source Python and R packages used in modern AI, data science, and machine learning. These enterprise-grade solutions enable corporate, research, and academic institutions around the world to harness open-source for competitive advantage and research. Anaconda also provides enterprise-grade security to open-source software through the Premium Repository.
$0
per month
IBM Watson Studio
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
IBM Watson Studio enables users to build, run and manage AI models, and optimize decisions at scale across any cloud. IBM Watson Studio enables users can operationalize AI anywhere as part of IBM Cloud Pak® for Data, the IBM data and AI platform. The vendor states the solution simplifies AI lifecycle management and accelerates time to value with an open, flexible multicloud architecture.N/A
Pricing
AnacondaIBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
Editions & Modules
Free Tier
$0
per month
Starter Tier
$9
per month
Business Tier
$50
per month per user
Enterprise Tier
60.00+
per month per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AnacondaIBM Watson Studio
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AnacondaIBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
Considered Both Products
Anaconda

No answer on this topic

IBM Watson Studio
Chose IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
The mix of proprietary and open-source benefits that DSx offers gives me more flexibility than any other options I have encountered. I have the custom program building capability of Anaconda with the built-in predictive models of SPSS Modeler. I have more visualization …
Chose IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
SPSS - Totally different approaches, SPSS UI is now a well-known name with a well-established user base who we consider aren´t going anywhere but Statistics.

Modeler - A proven analytical solution with capabilities to deal with huge datasets, scalability offers you now the …
Chose IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
DSx stands out in that deployment can be done easily through Watson ML whereas for other technologies separate paradigms are needed.
Chose IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
Elastic Search is based only on json format, while with IBM DSX I have no restrictions on this. One main limitation however appears in DSX when there are issues in importing different types of datasets in the notebook. In particular, the json importing fails somehow with nested …
Chose IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
I selected IBM Data Science Experience (DSx) because it promotes collaboration. That being said, it could be a bit challenging to prevent people who use it for the first time, because the interface could seem a bit complex for some - said by people I worked with. Therefore, it …
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
AnacondaIBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
Platform Connectivity
Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of Product A and Product B
Anaconda
9.4
24 Ratings
11% above category average
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
8.1
22 Ratings
4% below category average
Connect to Multiple Data Sources9.822 Ratings8.022 Ratings
Extend Existing Data Sources8.923 Ratings8.022 Ratings
Automatic Data Format Detection9.621 Ratings10.021 Ratings
MDM Integration9.614 Ratings6.414 Ratings
Data Exploration
Comparison of Data Exploration features of Product A and Product B
Anaconda
9.2
24 Ratings
9% above category average
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
10.0
22 Ratings
17% above category average
Visualization9.624 Ratings10.022 Ratings
Interactive Data Analysis8.923 Ratings10.022 Ratings
Data Preparation
Comparison of Data Preparation features of Product A and Product B
Anaconda
9.4
25 Ratings
13% above category average
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
9.5
22 Ratings
14% above category average
Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment8.823 Ratings10.022 Ratings
Data Transformations9.625 Ratings10.021 Ratings
Data Encryption9.719 Ratings8.020 Ratings
Built-in Processors9.520 Ratings10.021 Ratings
Platform Data Modeling
Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
Anaconda
9.3
23 Ratings
9% above category average
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
9.5
22 Ratings
11% above category average
Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools9.622 Ratings10.021 Ratings
Automated Machine Learning8.821 Ratings10.022 Ratings
Single platform for multiple model development8.923 Ratings10.022 Ratings
Self-Service Model Delivery9.618 Ratings8.020 Ratings
Model Deployment
Comparison of Model Deployment features of Product A and Product B
Anaconda
9.5
20 Ratings
10% above category average
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
8.0
22 Ratings
7% below category average
Flexible Model Publishing Options9.520 Ratings9.022 Ratings
Security, Governance, and Cost Controls9.519 Ratings7.022 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AnacondaIBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
Small Businesses
IBM SPSS Modeler
IBM SPSS Modeler
Score 7.8 out of 10
IBM SPSS Modeler
IBM SPSS Modeler
Score 7.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Mathematica
Mathematica
Score 8.2 out of 10
Mathematica
Mathematica
Score 8.2 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM SPSS Modeler
IBM SPSS Modeler
Score 7.8 out of 10
IBM SPSS Modeler
IBM SPSS Modeler
Score 7.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AnacondaIBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
Likelihood to Recommend
9.5
(37 ratings)
8.0
(65 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.0
(1 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(2 ratings)
9.6
(2 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
8.9
(9 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
AnacondaIBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
Likelihood to Recommend
Anaconda
As a Data Analyst, it is my job to analyze large datasets using complex mathematical models. Anaconda provides a one-stop destination with tools like PyCharm, Jupyter, Spyder, and RStudio. One case where it is well suited is for someone who has just started his/her career in this field. The ability to install Anaconda requires zero to little skills and its UI is a lot easier for a beginner to try. On the other hand, for a professional, its ability to handle large data sets could be improved. From my experience, it has happened a lot that the system would crash with big files.
Read full review
IBM
It has a lot of features that are good for teams working on large-scale projects and continuously developing and reiterating their data project models. Really helpful when dealing with large data. It is a kind of one-stop solution for all data science tasks like visualization, cleaning, analyzing data, and developing models but small teams might find a lot of features unuseful.
Read full review
Pros
Anaconda
  • It provides easy access to software like Jupyter, Spyder, R and QT Console etc.
  • Easy installation of Anaconda even without much technical knowledge.
  • Easy to navigate through files in Jupyter and also to install new libraries.
  • R Studio in Anaconda is easy to use for complex machine learning algorithms.
Read full review
IBM
  • Integration of IBM Watson APIs such as speech to text, image recognition, personality insights, etc.
  • SPSS modeler and neural network model provide no-code environments for data scientists to build pipelines quickly.
  • Enforced best-practices set up POCs for deployment in production with a minimum of re-work.
  • Estimator validation lets data scientists test and prove different models.
Read full review
Cons
Anaconda
  • Although I have generally had positive experiences with Anaconda, I have had trouble installing specific python libraries. I tried to remedy the solution by updating other packages, but in the end, things got really messed up, and I ended up having to uninstall and reinstall a total of about 4 times over the past 2 years.
  • If you have the free version of Anaconda, there is not much support. Googling questions and error messages are helpful, but there were times when I wished I would have been able to ask technical support to help me troubleshoot issues.
  • There were a few times when I tried to install tensorflow and tensorboard via Anaconda on a PC, but I could not get them to install properly. Anaconda allows you to create 'environments' , which allow you to install specific versions of python and associated libraries. You can keep your environments separate so they do not conflict with one another. Anyway, I ended up having to create several 'conda envrionments' just so I could use tensforflow/tensorboard and a few other utilities to avoid errors. This was somewhat annoying, because every time I wanted to run a specific model, I'd have to open up the specific conda environment with the appropriate python libraries.
Read full review
IBM
  • The cost is steep and so only companies with resources can afford it
  • It will be nice to have Chinese versions so that Chinese engineers can also use it easily
  • It takes a while to learn how to input different kinds of skin defects for detection
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Anaconda
It's really good at data processing, but needs to grow more in publishing in a way that a non-programmer can interact with. It also introduces confusion for programmers that are familiar with normal Python processes which are slightly different in Anaconda such as virtualenvs.
Read full review
IBM
because we find out that DSX results have improved our approach to the whole subject (data, models, procedures)
Read full review
Usability
Anaconda
The interface is an easy to use command-line interface, or a GUI for launching and/or discovering different parts of the system.
Read full review
IBM
The UI flawlessly merges this offering by providing a neat, minimal, responsive interface
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Anaconda
No answers on this topic
IBM
From time to time there are services unavailable, but we have been always informed before and they got back to work sooner than expected
Read full review
Performance
Anaconda
No answers on this topic
IBM
Never had slow response even on our very busy network
Read full review
Support Rating
Anaconda
Anaconda provides fast support, and a large number of users moderate its online community. This enables any questions you may have to be answered in a timely fashion, regardless of the topic. The fact that it is based in a Python environment only adds to the size of the online community.
Read full review
IBM
I received answers mostly at once and got answered even further my question: they gave me interesting points of view and suggestion for deepening in the learning path
Read full review
In-Person Training
Anaconda
No answers on this topic
IBM
The trainers on the job are very smart with solutions and very able in teaching
Read full review
Online Training
Anaconda
No answers on this topic
IBM
The Platform is very handy and suggests further steps according my previous interests
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Anaconda
No answers on this topic
IBM
It surprised us with unpredictable case of use and brand new points of view
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Anaconda
ANACONDA VS Alteryx Analytics: Even though I find Alteryx to be an excellent tool for managing extremely massive data, Anaconda is much better and easy for analytics. Anaconda VS. MicroStrategy Analytics: Compared with Anaconda, MicroStrategy Analytics is very difficult to use and counter-intuitive Anaconda VS. Power BI For Office 365: One of the main advantages of BI for Office 364 is its capacity to data connectivity. However, it's very hard to edit data connections, once BI for Office is deployed in other platforms
Read full review
IBM
The main reason I personally changed over from Azure ML Studio is because it lacked any support for significant custom modelling with packages and services such as TensorFlow, scikit-learn, Microsoft Cognitive Toolkit and Spark ML. IBM Watson Studio provides these services and does so in a well integrated and easy to use fashion making it a preferable service over the other services that I have personally used.
Read full review
Scalability
Anaconda
No answers on this topic
IBM
It helped us in getting from 0 to DSX without getting lost
Read full review
Return on Investment
Anaconda
  • Positive: Lower maintenance cost compared to other tools on the market
  • Positive: Ease in hiring professionals already accustomed to the tool in the job market
  • Positive: Projects are portable, allowing you to share projects with others and execute projects on different platforms, reducing deployment costs
Read full review
IBM
  • Could instantly show data driven insights to drive 20% incremental revenue over existing results
  • Still don't have a real use case for unstructured data like twitter feed
  • Some of the insights around user actions have driven new projects to automate mundane tasks
Read full review
ScreenShots