Apache Guacamole vs. Remote Desktop Services

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Apache Guacamole
Score 9.8 out of 10
N/A
Apache Guacamole is a clientless remote desktop gateway. Once installed on a server, all that is needed to access remote desktops is a web browser. Apache Guacamole is free and open source software. It is licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0, and is maintained by a community of developers that use Guacamole to access their own development environments.N/A
Remote Desktop Services
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Remote Desktop Services from Microsoft is virtual desktop and remote user session technology.N/A
Pricing
Apache GuacamoleRemote Desktop Services
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Apache GuacamoleRemote Desktop Services
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Apache GuacamoleRemote Desktop Services
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
Apache GuacamoleRemote Desktop Services
Remote Administration
Comparison of Remote Administration features of Product A and Product B
Apache Guacamole
8.7
2 Ratings
6% above category average
Remote Desktop Services
8.9
3 Ratings
8% above category average
Screen sharing9.52 Ratings9.33 Ratings
File transfer9.12 Ratings9.33 Ratings
Access to sleeping/powered-off computers9.12 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Over-the-Internet remote session10.02 Ratings8.73 Ratings
Initiate remote control from mobile7.02 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Remote management of servers & workstations9.52 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Centralized management dashboard8.01 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Session record8.01 Ratings9.52 Ratings
Monitoring and Alerts7.01 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Multi-platform remote control9.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Secure remote access with Smart Card authentication00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Remote Active Directory® management00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Apache GuacamoleRemote Desktop Services
Small Businesses
Getscreen.me
Getscreen.me
Score 9.7 out of 10
Getscreen.me
Getscreen.me
Score 9.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
NinjaOne
NinjaOne
Score 9.3 out of 10
NinjaOne
NinjaOne
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Remote Desktop Services
Remote Desktop Services
Score 9.1 out of 10
BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access
BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Apache GuacamoleRemote Desktop Services
Likelihood to Recommend
8.6
(2 ratings)
9.3
(17 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.0
(1 ratings)
6.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(1 ratings)
6.6
(2 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
3.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Apache GuacamoleRemote Desktop Services
Likelihood to Recommend
Apache
Limitations are only the effort you want to have to configure it (correctly).
Read full review
Microsoft
Remote Desktop services are well suited for people looking to connect to Local computers/Servers after connecting to VPN or Local Area Network. It is easy to use and performs superbly without any issues. However, it does not have support for connecting to Non-Windows-based Devices and Applications like Teamviewer beat RDP when it comes to connecting to machines outside one's network.
Read full review
Pros
Apache
  • Remote connect to Linux OS
  • Remote connect to Windows OS
Read full review
Microsoft
  • When you connect with RDS, everything looks and feels (and is) exactly like you're sitting at that desktop. This is great for us and for users.
  • You can sign in with RDS and the desktop will be the same as when you left it (if you choose to set it up that way).
  • Although they take some setup, RemoteApps are a very handy way to let users access a program without requiring them to actually connect to a remote desktop on the server.
Read full review
Cons
Apache
  • We have experienced some stability problems (mostly Tomcat related).
  • The interface could be a little more user-friendly.
  • Certain keyboard shortcuts used by Guacamole GUI are impossible to use in the Firefox browser in out-of-the-box configuration.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Remote Desktop Services currently does not support multiple monitors on the terminal server. Unlike other applications such as Teamviewer, there's no feature to toggle between multiple screens even if they were connected to the terminal server.
  • Remote Desktop Services should provide an option to scale up or down the screen size after a connection is established. Currently you can only adjust the screen size prior to a connection is established. So you'll have to take a best guess at what display screen resolution will fit best on your screen.
  • Remote Desktop Services should offer some kind of menu to send special key strokes like Ctrl+Alt+Del to the terminal server. Currently the substitute for that particular combination is Ctrl+Alt+End. But I have yet to discover a replacement for other combination keystrokes such as Alt+PrintScrn.
Read full review
Usability
Apache
it's easy
Read full review
Microsoft
The initial setup for Remote Desktop Services is complex, and licensing is costly. Each user connects to their virtual desktop hosted by a single server or group of servers, so a change or issue with servers quickly impacts every single user at the same time. Aside from that, users appreciate seeing their same personal desktop from any device or geographical location.
Read full review
Performance
Apache
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
There are some third party tools available that allow you to manage multiple connections.
Read full review
Support Rating
Apache
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
As with any Microsoft Server product, support for Remote Desktop Services requires a paid support package. These are license-based and very costly, on top of the already costly product licensing. Microsoft's licensing is complicated to begin with, so setting up licensing alone essentially requires a licensing expert's counsel. There is community documentation and support available on Microsoft websites, as well as community websites.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Apache
It's easy and free of use, therefore perfect for quick implementations when needed.
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Apache
We have successfully used noVNC for remote access.
Read full review
Microsoft
We selected Remote Desktop Services based upon price alone. Other solutions on the market are significantly more expensive, but if your company can foot the bill you should seriously consider products that have been on the market for longer. The lack of an ability to easily upgrade farm servers has been a challenge for us - although it is still faster than updating an application on 2000+ machines. The lack of a centralized management console in 2008 R2 is also challenging, but you get by with the tools available to you. If you don't have the money to spend on Citrix or VMWare Horizon, Remote Desktop Services is a decent replacement.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Apache
  • The software is 100% open source and free, however, we are not currently utilizing it due to stability problems we have experienced.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Allowed remote users access from home
  • Shared file access for multipolar users from a centralized location
  • Cost to add additional users when maxed out
  • Purchase multiple licenses for programs to run in virtual machines. Or unable to run on a virtual machine
Read full review
ScreenShots