Apache Kafka vs. Make

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Apache Kafka
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Apache Kafka is an open-source stream processing platform developed by the Apache Software Foundation written in Scala and Java. The Kafka event streaming platform is used by thousands of companies for high-performance data pipelines, streaming analytics, data integration, and mission-critical applications.N/A
Make
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
Make (formerly Integromat) automates integration between applications. It features data transformation capabilities within a no-code graphic interface. The former Integromat was acquired by Celonis in 2020, and the current product Make is a Celonis brand.
$9
per month
Pricing
Apache KafkaMake
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Free
$0
per month
Core
$9
per month
Pro
$16
per month
Teams
$29
per month
Enterprise
Contact
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Apache KafkaMake
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
Apache KafkaMake
Cloud Data Integration
Comparison of Cloud Data Integration features of Product A and Product B
Apache Kafka
-
Ratings
Make
8.3
4 Ratings
3% above category average
Pre-built connectors00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
Connector modification00 Ratings10.04 Ratings
Support for real-time and batch integration00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Data quality services00 Ratings7.04 Ratings
Data security features00 Ratings7.03 Ratings
Monitoring console00 Ratings7.04 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Apache KafkaMake
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Zapier
Zapier
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM MQ
IBM MQ
Score 9.2 out of 10
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM MQ
IBM MQ
Score 9.2 out of 10
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Apache KafkaMake
Likelihood to Recommend
8.4
(18 ratings)
9.0
(4 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
8.4
(4 ratings)
7.3
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
Apache KafkaMake
Likelihood to Recommend
Apache
Apache Kafka is well-suited for most data-streaming use cases. Amazon Kinesis and Azure EventHubs, unless you have a specific use case where using those cloud PaAS for your data lakes, once set up well, Apache Kafka will take care of everything else in the background. Azure EventHubs, is good for cross-cloud use cases, and Amazon Kinesis - I have no real-world experience. But I believe it is the same.
Read full review
Celonis
Integromat is the best tool for business automation in my opinion because unlike Zapier it allows us to integrate with any API even if the app is not available which allows us to create automation even with the less known apps that we use or the ones that we built internally for our own company.
Read full review
Pros
Apache
  • Really easy to configure. I've used other message brokers such as RabbitMQ and compared to them, Kafka's configurations are very easy to understand and tweak.
  • Very scalable: easily configured to run on multiple nodes allowing for ease of parallelism (assuming your queues/topics don't have to be consumed in the exact same order the messages were delivered)
  • Not exactly a feature, but I trust Kafka will be around for at least another decade because active development has continued to be strong and there's a lot of financial backing from Confluent and LinkedIn, and probably many other companies who are using it (which, anecdotally, is many).
Read full review
Celonis
  • UI/UX Simplicity and Features
  • Workflows are explained in details and even people without IT background can use the tool.
  • Consumption is nicely tracked.
  • Myriad of existing templates, solutions, and readymade connectors.
Read full review
Cons
Apache
  • Sometimes it becomes difficult to monitor our Kafka deployments. We've been able to overcome it largely using AWS MSK, a managed service for Apache Kafka, but a separate monitoring dashboard would have been great.
  • Simplify the process for local deployment of Kafka and provide a user interface to get visibility into the different topics and the messages being processed.
  • Learning curve around creation of broker and topics could be simplified
Read full review
Celonis
  • There are always new platforms and connections that we'd like to see
  • More flexibility in paying for operations (tasks) on a sliding scale, instead of by tier
  • More thorough support documentation on connecting various platforms and troubleshooting errors
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Apache
Kafka is quickly becoming core product of the organization, indeed it is replacing older messaging systems. No better alternatives found yet
Read full review
Celonis
No answers on this topic
Usability
Apache
Apache Kafka is highly recommended to develop loosely coupled, real-time processing applications. Also, Apache Kafka provides property based configuration. Producer, Consumer and broker contain their own separate property file
Read full review
Celonis
I think it is the easiest workflow tool that I have ever used. Drag and drop works perfectly, helping less computer friendly users to simplify and nest their workflows. Managers without IT experience are now dealing separately with most of issues on their own. Handover of tasks and workflows is also easier as it is possible to comment and explain everything inside one.
Read full review
Support Rating
Apache
Support for Apache Kafka (if willing to pay) is available from Confluent that includes the same time that created Kafka at Linkedin so they know this software in and out. Moreover, Apache Kafka is well known and best practices documents and deployment scenarios are easily available for download. For example, from eBay, Linkedin, Uber, and NYTimes.
Read full review
Celonis
The pricing schema is very attractive, almost 50% lower than the competition. You could start from free and then grow. It has a pretty big library of connections to other apps and services, which really helps you when everything is a mess. Integromat has a really easy-to-use interface. You could do almost everything with fewer than 5 clicks. Scenarios (automation steps to complete a routine) have graphics so you can configure them more easily.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Apache
I used other messaging/queue solutions that are a lot more basic than Confluent Kafka, as well as another solution that is no longer in the market called Xively, which was bought and "buried" by Google. In comparison, these solutions offer way fewer functionalities and respond to other needs.
Read full review
Celonis
Integromat allows us to do everything we used to do on Zapier but it doesn't limit us to only the popular apps, with Integromat we're integrating custom APIs and we get data from different servers through GET requests and it's exactly what we needed and Zapier couldn't provide it.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Apache
  • Positive: Get a quick and reliable pub/sub model implemented - data across components flows easily.
  • Positive: it's scalable so we can develop small and scale for real-world scenarios
  • Negative: it's easy to get into a confusing situation if you are not experienced yet or something strange has happened (rare, but it does). Troubleshooting such situations can take time and effort.
Read full review
Celonis
  • Enabled us to solve use cases for hundreds of clients and hundreds of different platforms
  • Provided the customization capabilities to automate accounting/invoicing processes that save dozens of man-hours a month
  • Allowed us to build custom churn/retention/engagement scores that have driven a 20% reduction in churn
Read full review
ScreenShots