Apify is a platform for web data extraction and automation. The core component is the Apify Store, a marketplace where developers can publish and monetize serverless cloud programs called Actors. Key Capabilities Serverless Automation Programs: Developers author Actors using JavaScript or Python. The Apify Store provides pre-built programs for tasks such as e-commerce data extraction, map scraping, price monitoring, and social media content aggregation. Web…
$29
per month
Maxio
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Maxio helps B2B SaaS companies maximize their revenue operations. The financial operations platform is designed to meet the unique financial challenges of B2B SaaS, including billing, subscription management, revenue & expense recognition, and SaaS metrics & analytics.
$0
30 Day Trial
Pricing
Apify
Maxio
Editions & Modules
Starter Plan
$29
per month
Scale Plan
$199
per month
Business Plan
$999
per month
Apify for Enterprise
Custom
Fully-customized web scraping and automation solution for any scale.
Build
$0
30 Day Trial
Grow
$599
per month up to $100k in monthly billings
Scale
Custom
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Apify
Maxio
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
Additional Details
The lowest-priced plan that has all the features needed and is recommended as a starting point. If users exceed the platform usage credits for a plan, a notification is sent, and the excess usage will be added to the next invoice or the user can upgrade to a higher plan.
Build Plan - Developer-friendly sandbox where you can try out billing for free for 30 days.
Grow Plan - Complete B2B subscription management platform with billing, revenue recognition, and reporting.
Scale Plan - Tailored solution to support high billing volumes and advanced requirements. Talk with Sales about available volume-based discounts.
Apify is 100% better in every domain. Also, you have the option to choose another actor if this one doesn't work, whereas with Octoparse you are very limited to their provided actors or to creating your own, and it's a learning curve again. It's also way more expensive to use …
I dont know any other products like apify, if i want to scrape the web, i usually make my own script, but sometimes that has its limits, so i use apify instead for more complex anti bot like tiktok
The best thing is the connection via MCP (I use Claude Code for that) and the ease of saying a prompt, searching among thousands of actors, and getting a good number of leads. The free plan to start is also awesome.
Apify has a cleaner interface, better documentation, and a lower learning curve for building and scheduling scraping workflows than Bright Data. The Apify Store has thousands of prebuilt Actors that can often be used immediately or customized with minimal effort. I also didn't …
These solutions aren't just competitors to Apify; they actually work together with it. On their own, they couldn't handle the issues (anti-bot protections), but combined with Apify, I can properly run the processes I need. I even looked for an alternative to Apify that does the …
If I would not have come across Apify I would have built my own scrapers and extractors but this would have been very time consuming and intense in maintenance so the main advantage was that it was working very quickly, it had all the scrapers I needed and it just kept working …
i tried phantombuster and scraperapi before but Apify is way better for technical stuff... phantombuster is okay for linkedin but too limited with their recipes while Apify lets u customize everything with actors. scraperapi is just proxies but Apify is a whole platform with …
Apify is more data heavy than Apollo and can be used to greater effect. Also, Apollo is not a very user friendly service and Apify is much more easily navigable than Apollo.
I don't know the competitors, but why look elsewhere for something that works so well? je ne connais pas les concurrents mais pourquoi aller chercher ailleurs ce qui fonctionne si bien.
Maxio (via information we found on their website and in the initial sales call) seemed like the most comprehensive fit at the time and we liked the interface. We eventually found out that there was a massive gap between what was promised us and what was actually delivered. …
I inherited SaaSOptics from several predecessors that worked on it before me. I believe they used Chargebee or Chargify before SaaSOptics, but I haven't used them. I pray that the market comes up with a better product for subscription revenue management, SaaS metric reporting, …
The reporting is better than what I've used in other products. I have been very impressed with the range and availability of the metrics. It's been a few years since I used Recurly regularly, but I have no need to look elsewhere for billing management needs after working with …
QuickBooks is what we originally used for invoicing, but we outgrew that and it was taking up a lot of time to manually create invoices. We also were tracking invoicing on an Excel spreadsheet for 500 customers, so there was a lot of room for error. SaaSOptics eliminated these …
Chargify is easier to use and manage. The Achilles heel is the 3rd-party integrations, where the options are limited. If managing a few products or businesses, this can be the more ideal option. WooCommerce has easy integration with WordPress but it requires the help of …
We did not evaluate other options. We decided to go with Chargify based on the ease of use and the ability to have multiple sites within one account. It accomplished what we needed to and for a price that was within our budget. At the time, Chargify was a great fit and we …
The other products (QuickBooks and Salesforce) are complementary to SaaSOptics. I have not used any products that compete directly with SaaSOptics although I understand there are several out there.
Insight squared did not integrate with HubSpot which is what we use as our CRM. We chose SaaSOptics because it offered GAAP compliant revenue recognition, great reporting, and the user experience quality was high.
Zuora is a B2C subscription billing system best used for companies like Netflix. For a B2B company, the sales process can be much more complex and Zuora was never able to handle that. For the 2 years we struggled with Zuora (now referred to the dark ages within our company) we …
We evaluated Recurly early on but rejected it because at the time it did not support the payment gateway we needed, and lacked some metered billing stuff that we needed. I understand they now have improved, but we did not go back to re-try them.
We evaluated several recurring billing services - but Chargify was the only one we found that supported our current merchant portal. They had the widest selection of merchant portals - and the most competitive service fees.
We previously used another recurring processor. Although their product worked well and was much cheaper, their customer service became increasingly less responsive. Chargify's API is equally easy to implement as our previous recurring payment processor..
Pricing ends up being pretty close across the board with their main competitors. What it came down to for us is having a vendor that went the extra mile and we felt that Chagify met that and they have exceeded that expectation.
Apify is great for solo developers who want to monetize scraping tools without building payment or infrsturctre themselves and want to get paid for their products, it is also great for developers who are targeting niche markets, I built scrapers for African real estate data which has very little competition on the store, which makes it easier for my products to be found.
SaaSOptics is awesome for growing companies that want to automate their invoicing. I like that it is also aimed at subscription based sales structures rather than sales that occur at a single point in time (but has the ability to support both). SaaSOptics makes it super easy to keep track of subscriptions, renewals, co-terms, etc. The reporting is a great feature, but we are unable to use most of the reports as we are a cash-based accounting firm. SO caters to accrual accounting and GAAP compliant firms which makes sense as it is the most commonly accepted accounting basis here in the US, but many small SaaS start-ups are still operating on cash basis. We are one of those companies, so we are able to get a ton of use out of the invoicing side of things, a lot of the reports are useless for us. We also wish SO had a commission module since we already integrate our CRM and accounting softwares into it, but that is not a make it or break it for us. We love the time SO has saved us.
I love how intuitive the interface is. Even without deep coding knowledge, I can set up workflows quickly. The ready‑made actors are extremely helpful and cover most of my use cases.
Apify makes it incredibly easy to automate repetitive web tasks. The platform is stable, the actors run smoothly, and the logs give me full visibility into every step.
Apify offers impressive flexibility — from custom actors to API integrations and scheduling options. It scales well even with large workloads, and the performance has been consistent.
Some actors are very expensive and offer limited value - $120 / month before event charges? That's insane. The monthly price also isn't listed in the main search screen, so you need to go in manually to each actor to ascertain how much it really costs
Some actors often break after a while and you need to start searching for new ones... but I guess that's the price for relying on 3rd party actors in your marketplace
The review/quality process isn't great to navigate when looking for a new tool.
It's the best because you can just load in a limited amount of money and limit your financial exposure to using a tool like this. so renewing isn't a big consideration... i know that i'm going to need the tool in the future and i'll load it with money accordingly when im ready.
It's plug-and-play with coding agents - just select the actor, key in your API and get started. However, it is worth mentioning that the actual console view can get a bit too much for folks who aren't from a core technical competence - a simplified view might help folks like us.
They are willing to help with most challenges and are pretty easy to get ahold of by phone. They are limited in their reach, when it comes to bulk cancellations, along with some other bulk edits. It is no fault to them, Chargify is just a system that hasn’t been upgraded much over the years.
Apify is 100% better in every domain. Also, you have the option to choose another actor if this one doesn't work, whereas with Octoparse you are very limited to their provided actors or to creating your own, and it's a learning curve again. It's also way more expensive to use Octoparse, and it doesn't always work well.
Maxio (via information we found on their website and in the initial sales call) seemed like the most comprehensive fit at the time and we liked the interface. We eventually found out that there was a massive gap between what was promised us and what was actually delivered. Below is an excerpt to an email that we sent to the technical solutions consultant and sales rep three months after purchase: "I am, however, frustrated that a solution promised in the demo call ended up being a solution that was so cumbersome that 1) no one knew how to implement it except [tech consultant], who I was never able to get ahold of 2) it delayed our launch by two months and resulted in real frustration for my team and thousands of dollars in lost revenue and 3) brought more effort and annoyance to our customers than we were anticipating. I'm bringing this to your attention because I strongly feel that there has been a discrepancy between possible solutions and actual solutions. It is frustrating to make a purchase decision based on features discussed during a demo call, develop a plan of action based on what was discussed, and then have to iterate for months on end. It is also frustrating to hear that something is an "easy" solution by one team member and then hear it is "difficult and not recommended" by another."
SaaSOptics has helped decrease the time spent on month-end. Their reporting is always accurate and reconciling deferred revenue is no longer a headache.
Increased accuracy in billing which has decreased the amount of invoice inquiries by our clients.
Sped up the quote-to-cash process with Salesforce.com and Stripe integration. Sales orders are processed faster and customers are utilizing "buttons" on invoices to submit payment details.
Increased our ability to stay on top of past due invoices with new collections module.
The metrics in SaaSOptics has improved financial presentations by providing more insight into our business.