Apigee Edge vs. Ataccama ONE vs. IBM InfoSphere Information Server

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Apigee Edge
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Apigee Edge is an API management platform now owned and offered by Google, since Google acquired Apigee in 2016.N/A
Ataccama ONE
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Ataccama is a data quality platform handling data parsing, standardization, cleansing and matching, and data profiling.N/A
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
IBM InfoSphere Information Server is a data integration platform used to understand, cleanse, monitor and transform data. The offerings provide massively parallel processing (MPP) capabilities.N/A
Pricing
Apigee EdgeAtaccama ONEIBM InfoSphere Information Server
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Apigee EdgeAtaccama ONEIBM InfoSphere Information Server
Free Trial
NoYesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Apigee EdgeAtaccama ONEIBM InfoSphere Information Server
Features
Apigee EdgeAtaccama ONEIBM InfoSphere Information Server
API Management
Comparison of API Management features of Product A and Product B
Apigee Edge
9.4
7 Ratings
11% above category average
Ataccama ONE
-
Ratings
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
-
Ratings
API access control9.07 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Rate limits and usage policies9.07 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
API usage data9.07 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
API user onboarding9.97 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
API versioning9.97 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Usage billing and payments9.06 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
API monitoring and logging9.97 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Source Connection
Comparison of Data Source Connection features of Product A and Product B
Apigee Edge
-
Ratings
Ataccama ONE
-
Ratings
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
8.7
4 Ratings
5% above category average
Connect to traditional data sources00 Ratings00 Ratings9.94 Ratings
Connecto to Big Data and NoSQL00 Ratings00 Ratings7.54 Ratings
Data Transformations
Comparison of Data Transformations features of Product A and Product B
Apigee Edge
-
Ratings
Ataccama ONE
-
Ratings
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
9.6
4 Ratings
17% above category average
Simple transformations00 Ratings00 Ratings10.04 Ratings
Complex transformations00 Ratings00 Ratings9.24 Ratings
Data Modeling
Comparison of Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
Apigee Edge
-
Ratings
Ataccama ONE
-
Ratings
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
8.0
4 Ratings
2% above category average
Data model creation00 Ratings00 Ratings8.72 Ratings
Metadata management00 Ratings00 Ratings7.74 Ratings
Business rules and workflow00 Ratings00 Ratings8.44 Ratings
Collaboration00 Ratings00 Ratings8.04 Ratings
Testing and debugging00 Ratings00 Ratings7.14 Ratings
Data Governance
Comparison of Data Governance features of Product A and Product B
Apigee Edge
-
Ratings
Ataccama ONE
-
Ratings
IBM InfoSphere Information Server
9.7
4 Ratings
20% above category average
Integration with data quality tools00 Ratings00 Ratings10.04 Ratings
Integration with MDM tools00 Ratings00 Ratings9.53 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Apigee EdgeAtaccama ONEIBM InfoSphere Information Server
Small Businesses
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Skyvia
Skyvia
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
Informatica Customer 360 for Salesforce
Informatica Customer 360 for Salesforce
Score 8.1 out of 10
dbt
dbt
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
Winshuttle
Winshuttle
Score 9.1 out of 10
InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 7.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Apigee EdgeAtaccama ONEIBM InfoSphere Information Server
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(7 ratings)
7.0
(2 ratings)
8.9
(5 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
6.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Apigee EdgeAtaccama ONEIBM InfoSphere Information Server
Likelihood to Recommend
Google
Few scenarios 1. For viewing API analytics, I think it is best in the market 2. For earning money via API monetization 3. Securing API 4. Onboarding legacy APIs to provide modern REST endpoints
Read full review
Ataccama
Usage for enterprise wide data management and governance across wide range of user group. Ataccama ONE enables achieving higher data quality amongst the data products. It is a powerful platform that supports integration of several checks on different data sets that can be also consolidated in reports later on. Data discovery works quite fast and easy.
Read full review
IBM
Information Server is extremely useful to replace manual developments that require a lot of coding effort. It significantly increases the productivity of the initial development and the future maintenance of the processes since it has a visual development environment with self-documentation.
Read full review
Pros
Google
  • Better exception handling with the Raise exception policies help to monitor the flow by setting up the flow conditions.
  • Easy development of a Proxy and APIs with much less tutoring and helps make getting started for new users easy.
  • Very good documentation and blog with details of most common failures and error handling.
  • A very very easy to use console.
Read full review
Ataccama
  • It is one of the leading data quality tools in the industry, in our opinion.
  • Offers free data profiling.
  • Integrates with other tools for complete end-to-end lineage.
Read full review
IBM
  • IIS best for ETL ,not ELT , and many and diffrent source systems.
  • It also can process big data , unstuctured data
  • It is not only DWH , you can use infosphere for analys and see the bigger architecture of your OLTP systems
Read full review
Cons
Google
  • Only one user can be active in a proxy at a time
  • No version control
  • Prohibited from using JSON.stringify on Apigee objects (tokens)
  • Debugging is difficult
  • Unable to rename or delete policies without bumping revision
  • Why would anyone give a js policy one name, display name something else, and script a different name?
  • 'Trace' limited to only 20 transactions
  • UI allows users to add target servers, but users must utilize the api to turn on SSL.
  • I'm sure there's more, they just aren't coming to mind right now.
  • Apigee forgets (expires?) your password at random intervals without notice. Every few weeks, or days, sometimes even three times in one day, I'll attempt to login to Apigee and my password will be 'wrong'. I've reset my password and Apigee still claims it's wrong. I've had to reset my password three times before it finally let me log back in.
Read full review
Ataccama
  • Performance in loading
  • Reduction of pop-up messages
Read full review
IBM
  • I would be nice to have a new web development environment for DataStage.
  • Connectivity Packs such as Pack for SAP Application are a little pricey.
  • It is confusing for new developers the possibility of developing jobs using different execution engines such as Parallel or Server.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Google
I am not the one deciding whether to use apigee or not really. But personally, I would recommend the use of it as developing APIs on it is easy. And as a mediator between backend servers, we could easily modify request and responses in it without touching any backend code while having a centralize gateway to access our backend APIs too.
Read full review
Ataccama
No answers on this topic
IBM
  • Scale of implementation
  • IBM techsupport
Read full review
Usability
Google
Support has helped us to resolved all the queries and community support was also good.
Read full review
Ataccama
One of the key factors in our choice to onboard Ataccama was its usability - general end users have everything at their fingertips, it is not difficult for IT developers to setup the tool, and it has been an overall pleasure.
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Google
Quite hard to get support, at least on the coding side, when we encounter blockers. But general concerns, they would schedule a call to you for them to get a whole picture of your concern. Albeit in my experience, bad really as they haven't replied about the progress, but otherwise seems to have been fixed.
Read full review
Ataccama
Support has been excellent to date - very user friendly and knowledgeable to help support our needs and issues as they arise.
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Google
Apigee is the best in the market in terms of API Analytics Apigee is having wonderful Documentation with short videos Security is a major concern and Apigee provides an easily configurable policy to secure API Quota and rate-limit is again very easy to configure on every API basis It provides various policies to transform the response from one form to another form e.g. JSON to XML or XML to JSON
Read full review
Ataccama
Ataccama ONE is a designated tool for Data quality monitoring. Supports end to end. Quite easy to deploy. Alteryx is more about coding or almost as complicated while Ataccama ONE is a bit easier to use. Different interfaces. Many views automatically available for data sets in Ataccama ONE. Output is vizualized in the tool. While more data transformation is required in Alteryx.
Read full review
IBM
DataStage is more robust and stable than ODI The ability to perform complex transformations or implement business rules is much more developed in DS
Read full review
Return on Investment
Google
  • As a public entity it is hard to say how much ROI we can have. We have yet to create a billing and ROI plan. We are thinking of other ways to create ROI, possibly through data/service barter.
Read full review
Ataccama
  • Less data inconsistencies in the system enable processes to run smoother without interruptions
Read full review
IBM
  • Productivity of the development of integration processes.
  • Better documentation and governance.
  • Reduce training costs of various technologies.
Read full review
ScreenShots