Appian is a low-code development and business process management platform. It features drag-and-drop design for app building, automated work processes, unified data management, and cloud-based deployment.
$0
Kontent.ai
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Kontent.ai is a headless CMS that helps content-driven organizations manage their content. Bringing greater speed, control, and governance to every aspect of content management, Kontent.ai helps them to publish better content faster. Kontent.ai is designed to accommodate every type of content workflow without sacrificing speed, compliance, or results. The vendor states Kontent.ai customers—including Elanco, Zurich Insurance, PPG, WebMD…
$30,000
per year (starting price)
Pricing
Appian
Kontent.ai
Editions & Modules
Appian Community Edition
$0
Application - Input-Only
$2
per month per user
Application - Infrequent
$9
per month per user
Application - Standard
$75
per month per user
Platform
Custom Quote Priced per user with unlimited apps.
minimum 100 users, no maximum
Unlimited
Custom Quote Priced per development with unlimited apps.
unlimited
Platform
Custom Quote Priced per user with unlimited apps.
Minimum 100, no maximum
Unlimited
Custom Quote Priced per development with unlimited apps.
Unlimited
Flexible Plan
30,000
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Appian
Kontent.ai
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Optional
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Appian
Kontent.ai
Features
Appian
Kontent.ai
Low-Code Development
Comparison of Low-Code Development features of Product A and Product B
Appian
9.1
75 Ratings
8% above category average
Kontent.ai
-
Ratings
Visual Modeling
8.873 Ratings
00 Ratings
Drag-and-drop Interfaces
8.972 Ratings
00 Ratings
Platform Security
9.271 Ratings
00 Ratings
Platform User Management
8.872 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reusability
9.575 Ratings
00 Ratings
Platform Scalability
9.573 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Appian
-
Ratings
Kontent.ai
8.2
1 Ratings
0% above category average
Role-based user permissions
00 Ratings
8.21 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Appian
-
Ratings
Kontent.ai
9.1
2 Ratings
16% above category average
API
00 Ratings
9.12 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language
00 Ratings
9.11 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
Appian
-
Ratings
Kontent.ai
8.5
2 Ratings
9% above category average
Admin section
00 Ratings
8.62 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design
00 Ratings
7.72 Ratings
Publishing workflow
00 Ratings
9.12 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Appian works great for automating manual processes and integrating multiple systems through its toolset. It gives great flexibility for establishing rules for approvals, routings, escalations, and the like. Because of the low code toolset, it's very easy to deploy and make changes as needed as processes evolve and as the organization learns to utilize the system better. Minimal maintenance is required to support the applications build on the platform. Some of the automated testing integration with tools like Jenkins is limited so that may be an issue for some.
Really easy integration to all of our services and apps. Delivery API libraries make the integration really fast. On the other hand, I miss the option to use SSO (Single Sign-On) with the Professional version of the Kentico Kontent. However, it is included in the Enterprise package.
Allows at a glance workflow documentation which assists in the need we have for information readiation.
Drag and drop interface for workflow development greatly speeds our apps time to market.
Using the advanced features of Appian, we are able to create working sites in a fraction of the time it would take to do so using "traditional" development.
Search issues when type ahead and database search are used in the same field.
Buttons implementation where user is require[d] to click on the button description - if clicks on the button outside that text - button will not work.
Problems with using certain off-the-shelf performance tools like WebLoad or Neoload. That is because of different dynamic variables being used internally in Appian - which these tools are unable to correlate. We are still investigating using other tools like Jmeter to overcome dynamic correlation problem for performance testing.
We recently renewed our license with Appian. We are convinced that its flexibility, relative ease of use, the support they provide, there mobile advancements and their general willingness and desire to see us succeed all contributed to our reason to renew our agreement with Appian
Appian is a low code environment, because of this, a very good visual interface is required. Appian is providing a feature-rich dashboard [that] we can use for building the dashboards and other interfaces. Appian also provides patches and releases to enhance these features. A developer can start off development just by going through a basic course from the Appian learning community.
Appian is one of the leading low code business automation platforms that support RPA, decision rules, case management, workflow automation, and machine learning all in a single bundle. But it is also harder to implement and replace the traditional business process.
As analyst I participated in a developer boot camp. At times it was hard to keep up but most of the time it made sense. Trainer took the time to explain and slowed pace down to answer questions etc.
Appian has enormously transformed and keeps on updating the product every quarter to meet the latest needs of the world with new innovations & technologies being integrated within the platform. What gives more pleasure than a product that keeps on continuous[ly] improv[ing]?
Unified access to the same content without the need to duplicate it across multiple solutions. We do not need to set up a complicated infrastructure to start using the Kentico Kontent.
I believe it has negatively impacted our release dates. There may have been a misunderstanding as to the learning curve, even though it is "low code."
The look and feel of the applications created using Appian have uniformity and it's easier to have "reuse" between applications.
There is less developer control when it comes to features. I think this mainly has to do with the amount of plugins available. I would think there should be many more available plugins. But again, our use case is probably different than most others.