Arc XP vs. RWS Tridion Sites

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Arc XP
Score 9.6 out of 10
N/A
Arc XP’s cloud-native tools help organizations create and distribute content, monetize websites and drive ecommerce, and deliver multichannel experiences. With a modular architecture built on AWS, Arc XP’s integrated ecosystem includes an agile content management system (CMS), a suite of digital subscription tools, a built-in DAM and video platform, and a hosted and managed low-code front-end experience platform. Built for flexibility, Arc XP’s agile CMS can be integrated into an existing…N/A
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
RWS Tridion Sites provides web content management capabilities, connecting people, processes, and information across teams, brands, and markets, to deliver impactful online experiences globally. RWS Tridion Sites' DPX platform enables the use of either traditional or headless publishing. It includes advanced features such as automated personalization, multilingual capabilities and Semantic AI. The BluePrinting® technology at the core of RWS Tridion Sites simplifies reuse and…N/A
Pricing
Arc XPRWS Tridion Sites
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Arc XPRWS Tridion Sites
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Arc XPRWS Tridion Sites
Features
Arc XPRWS Tridion Sites
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Arc XP
9.0
1 Ratings
8% above category average
RWS Tridion Sites
9.0
9 Ratings
9% above category average
Role-based user permissions9.01 Ratings9.09 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Arc XP
9.5
1 Ratings
14% above category average
RWS Tridion Sites
9.1
8 Ratings
16% above category average
API10.01 Ratings8.36 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language9.01 Ratings10.07 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
Arc XP
9.2
1 Ratings
22% above category average
RWS Tridion Sites
8.5
8 Ratings
9% above category average
WYSIWYG editor10.01 Ratings8.08 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness10.01 Ratings8.07 Ratings
Admin section8.01 Ratings9.08 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design10.01 Ratings9.07 Ratings
Publishing workflow8.01 Ratings9.08 Ratings
Page templates00 Ratings9.08 Ratings
Library of website themes00 Ratings8.24 Ratings
Form generator00 Ratings8.33 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Arc XP
10.0
1 Ratings
37% above category average
RWS Tridion Sites
7.6
8 Ratings
2% above category average
Content taxonomy10.01 Ratings9.07 Ratings
SEO support10.01 Ratings9.06 Ratings
Bulk management00 Ratings9.08 Ratings
Availability / breadth of extensions00 Ratings8.35 Ratings
Community / comment management00 Ratings3.03 Ratings
Digital Experience Platform
Comparison of Digital Experience Platform features of Product A and Product B
Arc XP
9.1
1 Ratings
1% above category average
RWS Tridion Sites
-
Ratings
Cloud enablement10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Content aggregation10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Content classification7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
DXP Third-Party Integrations10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-website management10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Digital asset management7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Editorial workflows and task management10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Arc XPRWS Tridion Sites
Small Businesses
Bloomreach - The Agentic Platform for Personalization
Bloomreach - The Agentic Platform for Personalization
Score 9.0 out of 10
ManageWP
ManageWP
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
Bloomreach - The Agentic Platform for Personalization
Bloomreach - The Agentic Platform for Personalization
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
OpenText Web CMS
OpenText Web CMS
Score 5.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Arc XPRWS Tridion Sites
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
9.9
(22 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
6.3
(15 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
Arc XPRWS Tridion Sites
Likelihood to Recommend
WP Company LLC (The Washington Post)
Arc XP is the state-of-the-art cloud based CMS for news publishing. It's well suited for large to medium organizations that want a robust, secure and scalable platform. Depending on the use case, it may still require a development team to maintain and make changes to the sites the CMS powers.
Read full review
RWS Group
Love the product and I really like how we use it for public sites. The only negative aspect is that it is just hard to find Tridion devs that understand the tool, grasp .net, react, and understand the blueprint, etc.
Read full review
Pros
WP Company LLC (The Washington Post)
  • Enables content creation and curation
  • Content distribution. Web and APIs
  • Easy to use development framework with good documentation and support
Read full review
RWS Group
  • Makes it easy to spin up a new site quickly
  • Allows for numerous users to work on the same site without conflicting with each other's changes
  • Allows you to unpublish changes or revert to old versions if you make a mistake
  • Allows you to time publishing actions (for example, you can set it to happen overnight)
Read full review
Cons
WP Company LLC (The Washington Post)
  • The CMS lacks a responsive design web interface or a good native app alternative.
  • It's heavily dependent on the AWS infrastructure and a disruption of the AWS service can cause serious problems
Read full review
RWS Group
  • Tridion is complicated in enough ways that it makes it difficult to train new users. Therefore, we have to limit the number of people with access to the system since we have not yet implemented Workflow.
  • When something goes wrong (items fail to publish, or there is unexpected behavior with components), there is little explanation provided that would point us in the right direction to troubleshoot. As a result, content Authors and Editors have to frequently ask for IT assistance.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
WP Company LLC (The Washington Post)
No answers on this topic
RWS Group
I am giving this a semi-high rating because we have already got Tridion up and running and we are still in the process of moving the sites over to Tridion. It is unlikely we will be moving things to a new CMS AGAIN in the near future as the cost to get Tridion was high.
Read full review
Usability
WP Company LLC (The Washington Post)
No answers on this topic
RWS Group
The editor user interface is very user friendly and in-site editing makes simple updates fast and easy. The extensibility of Tridion is a big plus and the ability to add our own options into the default Tridion interface helps us integrate with external systems. Finally, the user permissions and security system helps us deploy it within our large organization.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
WP Company LLC (The Washington Post)
No answers on this topic
RWS Group
It is a nuclear missile compared to the other handguns and knives on the market today. But it also requires nuclear technicians and expertise that a handgun doesn't require. Do you need to decimate your competition and you have the investment capabilities necessary to put a nuclear missile into the sky? Then definitely do it. Especially if you need a very good multi-lingual blueprint provider like Tridion.
Read full review
Return on Investment
WP Company LLC (The Washington Post)
  • After the implementation of the CMS, the development team started focusing more on developing new features for the site than maintaining the CMS and the infrastructure. 100% of the work is now focused on creating value to the customer.
Read full review
RWS Group
  • SDL is a very complex system. Creating custom components by external vendors turned out to be expensive.
  • The learning curve is very slow, so training takes a lot of time and cost.
  • The revamped corporate site looks clean, modern, and is mobile-friendly.
Read full review
ScreenShots